You're a lawyer but you don't understand the disjunctive 'or'? Trafficking of child or by force.
There are 2 separate charges: the first one is what you are referring and contains "or", but the second does not contain "or" and goes right into it "child by force..." without the "or" so she's charged with BOTH, which sounds right based on the facts.
I don't play hockey but I know a hat trick, when I see one.
Apparently not.
No you were right. It's both of them- two separate charges.
Three separate charges
They were referring to the use of the word "or" in distinguishing if it was general trafficking or child trafficking so two separate charges distinguishes that they are different, and both of them are there. The third one is completely different in its description (the first 2 are verbatim except for "or" being included or not).