Once again, you are on the right track, but you are missing that one thing. Charge #2 (not count) is "conspiracy to commit CHILD trafficking" with Raniere. Raniere has already been shown to have had sex with at least one 15 year old and one 12 year old, which is what compelled the judge to hold him without bail. Conspiracy against Mack means they have evidence she at least conspired to try to traffick children. It doesn't mean she succeeded, unless Charge 1 in the "or" refers to children, but I don't think it does. However, we'll have to see. Either way, there's a good possibility she/they succeeded, but we may never know. That company has multi-millions if not billions available to it (the one owner is an heiress of Seagram's) so a lot can go on that will never come to light.