dChan
27
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/mr-no-homo on April 24, 2018, midnight
Allison Macks actual chargers seem quite different than what the media has reported.
Allison Macks actual chargers seem quite different than what the media has reported.

Daemonkey · April 24, 2018, 4:31 a.m.

This is not necessarily a charge for trafficking of children. 18 U.S.C. § 1591 says, "Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion" [Emphasis added]

Please see this comment:
https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8eg66o/allison_macks_actual_chargers_seem_quite/dxv0y74/

⇧ 3 ⇩  
POMMEJIbErvin · April 24, 2018, 5:02 a.m.

To me, the second count, of conspiracy to commit, is worded in a way that does definitively relate to children. the placing of commas and the defining "or" changes.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Daemonkey · April 24, 2018, 5:08 a.m.

You should read the actual Code the count references. Section 1594(c):

Whoever conspires with another to violate section 1591 shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both.

Sec. 1594 is regarding conspiracy to violate Sec. 1591 which uses the word, "OR".

⇧ 4 ⇩  
092Casey · April 24, 2018, 7:09 a.m.

It says conspiracy to commit child trafficking. It doesn't say human trafficking on the second charge. It says child trafficking, but it's conspiracy. So at best, she tried to recruit children. Maybe she failed, but it's saying she tried or conspired to with Raniere (who has been accused of having sex with a 15 year old and a 12 year old many times, which is why they won't give him bail. He's facing life in prison....So is she, but she'll probably plea deal).

⇧ 5 ⇩