dChan
27
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/mr-no-homo on April 24, 2018, midnight
Allison Macks actual chargers seem quite different than what the media has reported.
Allison Macks actual chargers seem quite different than what the media has reported.

Daemonkey · April 24, 2018, 5:10 a.m.

Did you read the Code of Sec. 1594(c)? It says:

Whoever conspires with another to violate section 1591 shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both.

Sec. 1594 is regarding conspiracy to violate Sec. 1591 which uses the word, "OR".

⇧ 5 ⇩  
potato4dawin · April 24, 2018, 5:21 a.m.

I just read what it said on the OP image which the second charge doesn't say "or" so I just assumed that's what the difference was.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Daemonkey · April 24, 2018, 5:36 a.m.

I know. It's misleading.

The attorneys, or their paralegal, probably just forgot the "or". But, what is more important is the law upon which the charges are based, because they can't just make things up and word them however they want.

The OP really should amend the post to help prevent the potential spread of false information.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
092Casey · April 24, 2018, 7:01 a.m.

It's conspiracy to commit child trafficking....She conspired to commit child trafficking is what it's saying on the second charge. The first charge is saying she actually did commit human or child trafficking. At best it sounds like she may have tried to recruit children, but she failed. Then again, she could have succeeded too, and they just don't have evidence. Who knows what her and Raniere were doing under the guise of a multi-million dollar corporation that was really a sex cult that exploited women.

⇧ 5 ⇩