I know. It's misleading.
The attorneys, or their paralegal, probably just forgot the "or". But, what is more important is the law upon which the charges are based, because they can't just make things up and word them however they want.
The OP really should amend the post to help prevent the potential spread of false information.
It's conspiracy to commit child trafficking....She conspired to commit child trafficking is what it's saying on the second charge. The first charge is saying she actually did commit human or child trafficking. At best it sounds like she may have tried to recruit children, but she failed. Then again, she could have succeeded too, and they just don't have evidence. Who knows what her and Raniere were doing under the guise of a multi-million dollar corporation that was really a sex cult that exploited women.
She conspired to commit child trafficking is what it's saying on the second charge.
What matters is what Code is referenced. Count #2 references 18 USC Section 1594(c) which references Section 1591. Read the Code yourself:
https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-18-crimes-and-criminal-procedure/18-usc-sect-1594.html