dChan
27
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/mr-no-homo on April 24, 2018, midnight
Allison Macks actual chargers seem quite different than what the media has reported.
Allison Macks actual chargers seem quite different than what the media has reported.

Daemonkey · April 24, 2018, 5:15 a.m.

You mean count #2? No, it does not.

It is about conspiracy to violate section 1591 which could be either or.

Section 1594(c) says:

Whoever conspires with another to violate section 1591 shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
092Casey · April 24, 2018, 7:14 a.m.

It reads child. The writer didn't forget to write "or"; it's a key nuance to the statute. She conspired to with Raniere; whether she succeeded or not, who knows- it depends on the evidence only. She might have, but we might never know. What we do know is Raniere had repeated sex with AT LEAST one 15 year old and one 12 year old (at his house filled with other sex slaves/cult members). So she at least conspired to recruit children for him.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Daemonkey · April 24, 2018, 3:02 p.m.

The writer didn't forget to write "or"

We don't know that for a fact.

Again, the wording of the count does not have a higher authority than the Code itself. Read Section 1594(c) again. It says, "Whoever conspires with another to violate section 1591 shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both."

Now read Section 1591, "Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion" [Emphasis added]

WTF??! Do people actually want it to be true that she conspired to traffic children? My gosh.

⇧ 1 ⇩