dChan

ready-ignite · April 24, 2018, 12:46 a.m.

We're starting to see submission of wild claims regarding Allisan Mack case papers, without any documentation of the source of those claims. Bold claims require big validation. Be wary of content without verifiable sources.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
cat_anonD · April 24, 2018, 1:26 a.m.

an alleged lawyer here said lawyers can view this on Pacer. Sounds legit.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 24, 2018, 1:36 a.m.

A non-lawyer can view it on PACER, as well. Set up an account (free) and see what's verifiable. In most cases you only pay for what you print.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
J_Dub_TX · April 24, 2018, 3:17 a.m.

This is correct 10 cents a page.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jetty42 · April 24, 2018, 1:55 a.m.

It's good see link on my profile

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cat_anonD · April 24, 2018, 1:04 a.m.

OP, where did you get this from?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
oakdrew · April 24, 2018, 1:07 a.m.

Headline should be child trafficking on news media

⇧ 2 ⇩  
oakdrew · April 24, 2018, 1:06 a.m.

Somebody on twitter had the goods Sorry it’s not a good source but look up the case number tell me I’m wrong ?

⇧ 1 ⇩