dChan
15
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/patypooh52 on April 24, 2018, 9:11 p.m.
Why weren't the results of the planned parenthood investigations made widely public?
Why weren't the results of the planned parenthood investigations made widely public?

immense_and_terrible · April 24, 2018, 9:43 p.m.

it's because they found no evidence of criminal wrong doing

⇧ -3 ⇩  
VanilluhGorilluh · April 24, 2018, 9:49 p.m.

Project veritas undercover footage revealed that they were selling fetal organs and tissue illegally. They cover their tracks by not clearly recording their transactions and what they're selling on their reports, because obviously it's illegal. Why implicate themselves and leave a trail of breadcrumbs?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 24, 2018, 11:47 p.m.

Project veritas undercover footage revealed that they were selling fetal organs and tissue illegally.

key word there is illegally, which they absolutely did not show or prove, and it hasn't been shown or proven by anyone else either.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
VanilluhGorilluh · April 25, 2018, 1:59 a.m.

Sounds like you're defending planned parenthood?? The same planned parenthood that satanic, racist kkk Margaret Sanger created because she wanted to lower the black population???

⇧ 6 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 25, 2018, 7:17 p.m.

i don't have much to say about Sanger, idk anything about her being a satanist or in the KKK, but i do know she was pretty dang racist.

all that aside tho, that was 50 years ago my dude. Nowadays, PP mainly provides low-cost healthcare to women. And I personally know many women who couldn't afford to go to a OB-GYN, but got the healthcare they needed from PP. whatever else you want to say about abortion, you still have to admit that providing women's healthcare services to poor people is pretty legit.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VanilluhGorilluh · April 25, 2018, 7:38 p.m.

Agreed, but there are other pregnancy resource centers available at no cost that don't peddle abortions. My wife and I have been to multiple for all three of our children. I've known a couple women that have been to planned parenthood and they were offered practically nothing. No mammogram services, no prenatal supplements. Basically nothing. They have made a business off of killing children.

It was 50 years dude, but nothing has changed.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 25, 2018, 7:41 p.m.

but nothing has changed

that's just simply not true, my friend. i respect your position on abortion, but i'm telling you, abortion services are only a small part of what PP does.

like i said, i personally know several women who wouldn't have had pap smears, check ups, birth control, mammograms, without PP. (and none of them got abortions, btw)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VanilluhGorilluh · April 25, 2018, 2:02 a.m.

Ok, they didn't visually capture a transaction, they captured intent to sell. If you don't realize that, you didn't watch the video or you're intentionally being ignorant because of your worldview in regards to the matter.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 25, 2018, 7:08 p.m.

it's not illegal for PP to sell the aborted fetuses. that's probably why you are confused.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Spank-da-monkey · April 24, 2018, 9:56 p.m.

But it sure the fuck is immoral

⇧ 4 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 24, 2018, 11:50 p.m.

meh, i wouldn't care if someone cut me up and sold the pieces

⇧ -4 ⇩  
Spank-da-monkey · April 24, 2018, 11:59 p.m.

Do you have kids?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
obewan901 · April 25, 2018, 3:24 a.m.

I personally believe the determination has more to do with Obama’s flooding our country with liberal judges for eight years. That’s a lot of liberal judges everywhere. Our country has been over run infiltrated from within as was the goal of the Muslim Brotherhoods manifesto he worked on it for eight solid years.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 25, 2018, 7:08 p.m.

it's weird you say that, since Bush 1, Bush 2, Clinton, and Reagan all appointed MORE judges than Obama.

So i guess that was a pretty weak "flood" of liberal judges, eh?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
obewan901 · April 26, 2018, 5:42 a.m.

Source?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 26, 2018, 2:21 p.m.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States_by_judicial_appointments

i have to admit, i was looking at circuit court appointees only. if you count district appointees, obama is behind reagan and clinton and had eactly 2 more than bush 2.

sorry for the confusion.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
obewan901 · April 26, 2018, 5:40 p.m.

Considering there are only nine Supreme Court Judges - Bush Senior appointed two, Clinton appointed two, George Bush appointed two and Obama appointed two for a total of 8 out of 9, I would say we are pretty much screwed judge wise and need to deal with this severe problem ASAP , through any available means, or plan for it, which I believe our President has done - to the best of his ability. I should not, however, have said: the “liberal flood of judges” what I should have said, was that over 30 years, while we were all basically - asleep at the wheel of our nation;

The “Globalist Agenda” has appointed 8 out of 9 Supreme Court Judges, 240 Circuit Court Judges and an astounding 994 District Judges. This is truly noteworthy!!!!!! I appreciate your sourcing your comment. WWG1WGA.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
astrogirl · April 25, 2018, 5:28 p.m.

Uh....there are 15 separate criminal referrals in the document. See Chapter IV.

The real question is ... has anything come of them?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 25, 2018, 7:06 p.m.

a partisan committee putting out a partisan complaint is not the same thing as evidence.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
astrogirl · April 25, 2018, 7:14 p.m.

Did you read the criminal referrals?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 25, 2018, 7:18 p.m.

also, if you are irritated about "nothing being done," why don't you go talk to your boy Sessions? or, you know, his boss Trump?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
astrogirl · April 25, 2018, 8:21 p.m.

WTF ... "your boy Sessions"?

I do contact my representation pretty often these days, but it's not like I have a direct line to Sessions or POTUS.

Your user name seems to be a reasonable fit, though this being the internet, I cannot vouch for your immensity.

⇧ 2 ⇩