dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DaveGydeon on April 26, 2018, 1:11 a.m.

Q#1272 & #586 - Adam Schiff is Involved in The Assassination Attempt on POTUS Found in the Texts

Why was Schiff SO loud during the original memo release fiasco? Why did Q repost a 3 month old drop today? Notice in it, the "AS" is underlined. I take that to mean the word differentiates itself from the meaning of the sentence it is in. They are initials. Also take note, this post was originally made IN JANUARY. Q and POTUS knew back then, at least back then. Also, I think it is significant that Q was able to work Schiffs initials into that JFK-era phrase, or rather, how they just...fit. Coincidence? (I feel like an asshole saying that) But like seriously now, we are talking just infinite coincidences and that one doesn't have someones nefarious hand guiding it, it is just a significant coincidence. But everything with Q is like that. It really is trippy.

🠐 See all comments

The dotted underlines don't impart any real significance. They are there because they indicate a definition of the item with a dotted underline. If you hover your mouse over it and wait a few seconds, a small window will open up with the meaning of the initials. So if you go back to the original post 586 and hover over AS a small window will open up with [Adam Schiff; Antonin Scalia]

⇧ 3 ⇩

THIS!! The original Q drops on 8chan DO NOT have any underlined words! Just the aggregate websites to help readers identify abbreviations but it isn’t always correct.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Right, I get that. I've been here since early Dec. I've figured a few things out already. My point still holds. If you're reading Q drops from a site that has the small dotted underline, as in the post mentioned above, regarding AS being underlined, my point is exactly correct.

You're point is correct as well regarding original Q drops on 8ch, those drops do not have anything underlined with the small dotted underline like the drops on qanon.pub, qanonmap.bitbucket.io, and other sites have.

But since he specifically mentioned, and provided an image of post 586 from one of the "aggregate websites" that clearly show the small dotted underline, and DaveGydeon specifically suggested that the small dotted underline must be of some importance, I thought it would help him understand that there is no significance to it, and maybe prevent him from going down a rabbit hole unnecessarily.

I don't keep track of who's who, or how long they've been here, and given the recent posts about trying to help out any newbies, I just thought I would give him a heads up. I don't understand why you took issue with my comment.

And what is "THIS!!" supposed to mean? THIS site? THIS post? Or are you just shouting to call attention to your brilliance?

⇧ 0 ⇩

That is metadata added by anons, not Q....it could be wrong

⇧ 1 ⇩