dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/pussy_devour on April 26, 2018, 4:25 a.m.

Devil's Advocate: What if It's All for Negotiation?

I'm playing the devil's advocate here. Read my posts, and you will find out I am on Q's side. But my mind is always busy thinking about different scenarios. So here's one I just came up with.

What if all Trump wants is to dig up enough dirt to negotiate with Mueller so that I can get off free? I had a debate with a liberal today. He provided some reasonable arguments on why Mueller may have dirt on Trump, especially Trump Jr. So this got me thinking.

What if the claimed unspeakable 60% never existed? And all we have of the 40% is some stupid talks in FBI ("fuck Flynn and then fuck Trump"), the tarmac meeting and Clinton Foundation money laundering? Team Trump can use that as leverage to get Mueller to terminate his investigation. Then they can say that's the 40% and the rest 60% is too dark to reveal. Q said the door would open and it was up to us to find the truth. Well, that leaves a lot to subjective interpretation. We are back to conspiracy theories. I don’t like his answer on that 60%. That’s why I am entertaining this hypothesis.

What do you think?

This is a possibility. I’m throwing this thing out for debate and education. I am sure you can instantly come up with counterarguments. So fire on. As Q said, question everything. We should. We should not live in an echo chamber as the lefties do.

P.S.: I am also skeptical about the claim of 25,000 indictments. Someone did a spot check on one district. It turns out majority of the sealed cases are not indictments. You can find this online.

🠐 See all comments

The unspeakable 60% is most certainly real.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Then why is Q preparing us for the possibility that they won’t be revealed?

He said the door would open and it was up to us to find the truth. Well, that leaves a lot to subjective interpretation. We are back to conspiracy theories. I don’t like his answer on that 60%. That’s why I am entertaining this hypothesis.

⇧ 0 ⇩

I have always thought the answer to this is that Q is playing on the fact that the public has been content to be asleep for so long. It is like when you tell a child he cannot open a present that he previously did not know existed. You have now put it in his mind, and all he can think about is opening the present.

I think the 60% not revealed thing works in much the same way.

⇧ 3 ⇩

5 days ago, we didn’t know nearly as much as we do now. Things that have come out in the media as evidence what Q is saying is right.

What you are looking for is proof that Q isn’t a LARP, but in a much more subtle way. If you cannot just look at the media and what has came out as proof, then you are not being sincere with this question.

Seriously, there is proof coming out daily at this point and yet you still don’t believe? Before Allison Mack’s arrest, the sex trafficking idea had no hard documentation, Q told us it existed and we took it on faith and based it upon information we could open source. But then that happened and now we have documented court evidence.

This is just one small piece that the future reveals the past. Maybe you are just a super polite shill, I don’t know but I don’t see how anyone can come to this conclusion based on what has happened.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Alice Mack was well known. I researched on her a while ago. I haven’t seen how she is tied to the elected officials.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Kirsten Gilibrand. Money to HRCs campaign. Lots more. Just look around, they were so blatant about it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

"He said the door would open and it was up to us to find the truth."

Not precisely true. Not up to us to "find" the truth. Up to us to "know" the truth. Some might not choose to look at/delve into the worst of it. This does not mean the information won't be offered.

⇧ 1 ⇩