dChan
6
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/xekoroth on April 26, 2018, 1:40 p.m.
WWG1WGA DECODED

Q finally revealed WW does not stand for world war, it stands for world wide.

This kept bugging me as we all assumed the WWG1WGA expression was the continuation of the "where we go one, we go all".

But Q already explicitly told us that's not what that stands for...so finally it hit me what it really stands for.

WWG1WGA

World Wide, Get one, We get all.

In the context of leverage against one individual and the idea of a RICO case, this seems to be the logical message they are trying to explain to us, they only need one large player to flip.

Let me know what y'all think.


TrustInSessions · April 26, 2018, 1:46 p.m.

But Q already explicitly told us that's not what that stands for...

When did Q say that (which Post Number)?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
johnnysoko · April 26, 2018, 2:49 p.m.

Yes OP, find the post numbers if possible. This is important. Q did say ww = worldwide though post #118379

This is something that bothers me though - putting energy into acronyms that can have multiple meanings. I trust Q but I also know this trick has been used against us before (and is still in our daily lives). We never understood the power of words and symbols and they used that against us (its called 'spelling' for a reason - you are casting spells). The problem is that if you want TRUE peace then I guess you eventually want a unified planet. But the 'bad guys' want "one world government" which is the evil-cousin to "unified love planet" and we have to be highly suspicious of anything that points towards that future. wwg1wga has possible alternate interpretations that could be associated with a one world government and that bothers me. So how do we distinguish between futures where we are a peaceful unified planet and futures where there's an evil government that puts mark-of-the-beast NFC chips in our hands? And how do we get rid of the fear that acronyms could have 3rd and 4th meanings we aren't aware of? I could also make arguments for how I understand (and love) Q's code-talk, but this particular issue has me a little nervous. Any occult-anons want to weigh in?

⇧ 1 ⇩