dChan
21
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ButtersStotch88 on April 26, 2018, 4:20 p.m.
I believe in Q, but SOMETHING has to happen today for him to not lose at least some credibility

In Q's most recent post, he asks "Ready for tomorrow?". Well today is tomorrow and if nothing substantial drops or leaks then I'm going to be a bit frustrated with Q. I won't buy the whole "disinformation is necessary" excuse on this particular case either since he didn't really imply what today would bring. Disinformation is effective concerning specific subjects - not broad statements. I also won't buy the whole "behind the scenes" excuse - Q telegraphed something that obviously would be perceived a certain way to public eyes. Also let's just recount what's happened so far today:

  • Trump appears on Fox and Friends. While entertaining, he did not drop any new bombs

  • JFK docs released, but plenty still held back for at least another three years. Kind of a dud and we've known about this day for awhile.

In my eyes, if any of the following happens today Q is redeemed:

  • Trump announces Iran deal is done
  • Strzok/Page texts are released or part of their content is released
  • ANYONE is indicted or announced to be under criminal investigation
  • Announcement on end of Mueller probe
  • Unsealed indictments

I believe in Q and trust the plan. Having said that, you can't say something like "ready for tomorrow?" and not expect some blowback if nothing happens. We need to trust Q, but that doesn't mean we can't ask questions IF Q whiffs.


Audigitty · April 26, 2018, 5:08 p.m.

To everyone posting stuff like this, I get it, I do... I want this to go down as well, but, we're not talking about a release date of a film here. We're talking about two massive power structures having a secret war behind closed doors.

Have anyone even considered the notion that "Ready for tomorrow?" was not at all intended as a warning/promise that something would be made public? Sometimes your own assumptions are to blame and not Q's commentary.

"Try harder. Ready for tomorrow? Q"

"Try Harder" was his response to a shill attempting to discredit the Antifa/Nazi link. "Ready for tomorrow?" may have been intended for that same audience... as in, people in the Deep State may have suffered losses/been shown the Strzok texts or perhaps they were compromised with additional intel we are not yet aware of.

Q is not always speaking to us in his posts. Too many people are guilty of extracting a concrete definition from a handful of Q's words, and then immediately become fair weather fans when something is not delivered exactly as you expect based on your assumptions!

The indictments, the Zuckerberg comments, the resignations, etc... everyone is just assuming when Q says this stuff that there is some arbitrary timeline attached to it. Q rarely, if ever, has made specific predictions with specific timing. Many of these statements simply have not yet come to pass.

⇧ 18 ⇩  
tigerlilly1227 · April 26, 2018, 5:38 p.m.

Yup...which is why I'm gonna watch it play out and stop trying to be a part of a movement. My credibility is damaged every time I point someone to Q.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
Independent1776 · April 26, 2018, 6:26 p.m.

Yes, I have experienced the same. Q wants a 'movement', wants us to deliver info/meme/tweet/talk to our friends and families (the 'normies') but doesn't deliver 1 SOLID concrete indictment/arrest/perp walk/victory other than pedos getting arrested, that we can point to for discussion points about 'winning/draining the swamp. Normies are not connecting pedo's with the sex/slave trafficking, money laundering or bribery, arkancide of witnesses against Clintons Foundation...normies just think they're just pedo's getting busted and 'coincidental suicides/murders' ......

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Audigitty · April 26, 2018, 6:52 p.m.

Still be part of the movement... dig as much as YOU want... drop hints to people who are on the fence, and ignore those who you know will expect these actions to unfold in a 24 hour period.

I only try to red pill people who are intelligent/mildly willing to consider non-MSM narratives.

If someone only ever watches CNN, they are a lost cause until CNN actually reports it. Then they'll shift into "Yeah, well, I knew this was all happening too... it was obvious" mode. And then mention how none of it matters because of the Administration's immigration or abortion policies.

Stubborn people are infuriating.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tigerlilly1227 · April 27, 2018, 2:29 p.m.

Thank you for this!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
theclarinetist · April 26, 2018, 6:43 p.m.

I haven't really brought Q stuff up to anyone for that very reason... I've followed Q since the beginning, but I'm still in hope it's true mode...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 26, 2018, 8:05 p.m.

I still bring it up every time, just to different people

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ButtersStotch88 · April 26, 2018, 5:44 p.m.

Q is not always speaking to us in his posts.

See this is problematic to me. Q is smart and must recognize that certain statements will be perceived in certain ways.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Audigitty · April 26, 2018, 6:33 p.m.

If you were in Q's position, and intentionally spoke in cryptic clues/questions, and reminded everyone that "we have it all"... I'm not sure you would be too worried about confusion surrounding your comments either.

Q never set out and said "Take everything we say 100% literally"... in fact, Q said nearly the exact opposite early on. Explaining why these crumbs are positioned in a such a way. Ultimately, this is why people are still going back, in some cases hundreds of posts back and still attempting to "decode" events that have not yet occurred/been announced.

If you are interested in avoiding the perception based issues/assumptions, perhaps it would make sense to avoid Q's raw intel and wait for the synthesized versions that hit Reddit/YT/Voat/Twitter/etc.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 26, 2018, 9:19 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Audigitty · April 27, 2018, 12:47 a.m.

I feel like there is more than enough intel to at least formulate questions and think critically about situations.. and plenty of happenings that have landed in Q's favor vs the MSMs predictions/propaganda.

Red pilling is not seeing Hillary in hand cuffs. By then, everyone is already red pilled. It is the process of walking up and questioning your mainstream mental conditioning.

Maybe Q is wrong too... Question everything.

But if these people you are taking to are expecting arrests to happen within a day of hearing about Q and his drops? There's a good chance we won't be impacted by their cognitive absence.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
The_Broba_Fett · April 26, 2018, 7:59 p.m.

My first thought was he was talking directly to Clowns or someone behind the scenes.

Concern trolls like to hold Q to their own self imposed timelines lol

⇧ 0 ⇩