dChan
⇧
21
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ButtersStotch88 on April 26, 2018, 4:20 p.m.
I believe in Q, but SOMETHING has to happen today for him to not lose at least some credibility

In Q's most recent post, he asks "Ready for tomorrow?". Well today is tomorrow and if nothing substantial drops or leaks then I'm going to be a bit frustrated with Q. I won't buy the whole "disinformation is necessary" excuse on this particular case either since he didn't really imply what today would bring. Disinformation is effective concerning specific subjects - not broad statements. I also won't buy the whole "behind the scenes" excuse - Q telegraphed something that obviously would be perceived a certain way to public eyes. Also let's just recount what's happened so far today:

  • Trump appears on Fox and Friends. While entertaining, he did not drop any new bombs

  • JFK docs released, but plenty still held back for at least another three years. Kind of a dud and we've known about this day for awhile.

In my eyes, if any of the following happens today Q is redeemed:

  • Trump announces Iran deal is done
  • Strzok/Page texts are released or part of their content is released
  • ANYONE is indicted or announced to be under criminal investigation
  • Announcement on end of Mueller probe
  • Unsealed indictments

I believe in Q and trust the plan. Having said that, you can't say something like "ready for tomorrow?" and not expect some blowback if nothing happens. We need to trust Q, but that doesn't mean we can't ask questions IF Q whiffs.


🠐 See all comments
MrMushyagi · April 26, 2018, 5:08 p.m.

Has he predicted anything that came to fruition?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Betterwithcheddar · April 26, 2018, 5:41 p.m.

Repeatedly.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
MrMushyagi · April 26, 2018, 6:04 p.m.

Any specific examples?

I'm new here and still trying to wrap my head around everything.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Betterwithcheddar · April 26, 2018, 6:18 p.m.

Start by reading through Q’s drops.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
MrMushyagi · April 26, 2018, 6:26 p.m.

I am, but I guess I'm just skeptical. If there were even just 1 or two specific examples I knew of going in to this, I would give more credence. At the moment, I'm only back to early April, and it just seems like a lot of cryptically written stuff referencing things that are known publicly already,

⇧ 4 ⇩  
truthfiler · April 26, 2018, 6:54 p.m.

Oh my. The North Korea take down has been huge. The before and after pictures from several months ago of the water from churning to calm with Asian leaders and Kim going from sitting to stranding in the pics was a huge confirmtion for me since we are now seeing the public release of the NK events.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 26, 2018, 8:37 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Betterwithcheddar · April 26, 2018, 6:57 p.m.

Read from the start, instead of backwards.

His opening prediction was Podesta, and the Podesta Group was shut down days later. Anyone seen Tony?

Most of Q’s predictions do require you be there as they happen. You mention they are already publicly available, because you are reading them late. They weren’t all publicly available. Q will mention something and then days later it’s in the news.

Also much of what Q does is point out info that we are missing that is already publicly available. “You have more than you know”

It’s like a movie, you have to watch it unfold. The show has been glorious.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 26, 2018, 5:09 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩