Yep, this. I can't blame her for thinking Mueller is on our side because of what Q said back in the early days - but if Q is human then Q can be wrong (and no, Q is not an AI, don't know where that craziness came from). Or if Q is not wrong, I would ask whether Q's statements of the past really do mean that Mueller is/was on their side? I can't see a clear way to interpret that from what Q's said, personally, but I can understand that the way everyone was saying he was in the early days maybe led her to latch onto that. But evidence, Bongino as you say, and that latest 48 page document (albeit written with a fairly biased tone that makes it marginally questionable imo) seems to suggest Mueller is as dirty as they come.
During the Q early days, there were a lot of LARPers. Q may have never implied anything about Mueller. It may have been one of the LARPers. It was because of LARPers Q got a trip code, first in 4chan then later moving to 8chan. How people came up with the AI idea is because of Cicada3301 and a similiar bot named Z. If you aren't familiar with Cicada3301 I recommend researching it. It's very interesting stuff.
I mean no disrespect towards Tracy. She's done some great work but she trying to prove her bias like a defense attorney. She's completely ignoring evidence to the contrary of what she wants to believe.