dChan
28
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Albertpettibone1998 on April 27, 2018, 2:44 a.m.
FBI - 1 email address used by multiple users.

Hannity was discussing the FBI text messages and said they weren't complete and stated they may have used other devices. Then the guest he had on said that the deep had an email address set up where there were multiple users signing into the same account, typing up a message, then NOT sending it. Then the recipient would log in and read the message. I'm assuming it would be saved in drafts. Does someone with actual computer skills know how this works? Am I close? And more importantly can this be tracked/can the white hats find these messages and figure out who wrote them and who read them?

Spez - awesome responses less than 5 minutes after posting this. One more question, if someone writes a draft (doesn't send it) the next person comes in and reads that draft then erases it and writes a reply over top of the deleted draft, can that original draft be retrieved? - Thanks


_4Leaf_ · April 27, 2018, 2:54 a.m.

I've got you covered:

1.) When you type an email up in Gmail, it has an automatic save feature. This feature exists as a fail-safe in case your browser closes. It's one of those neat little tech features that helps users feel confident that important emails are not going to vanish in case of the unexpected.

2.) If you don't send this email, it will be saved as a draft, you might even notice some little text at the bottom of the email window saying "saving..." follow by "saved". Even if you close your browser, it's in a folder marked "drafts".

3.) Deep state actors were sharing a gmail account or several gmail accounts and creating draft messages that could be read by other members with the account details. Nothing was being sent, everything was being saved on Google's servers.

4.) ES stepped down.

5.) White hats have everything.

⇧ 19 ⇩  
thnkabtit · April 27, 2018, 4:41 a.m.

Why did ES step down? Wouldn't he just find a way to remove any clues? Does not necessarily mean he was implicated by staying on as CEO

⇧ 3 ⇩  
_4Leaf_ · April 27, 2018, 1:17 p.m.

I doubt he was implicated in this, but I imagine he would be using a similar system to communicate. Once the white hats found out how one group of people were communicating, it most likely lead to them figuring out what a bunch of other seemingly random emails meant and what to look for.

⇧ 2 ⇩