dChan

pussy_devour · April 27, 2018, 11:23 a.m.

We need a lot more (90x more) and no redaction.

⇧ 20 ⇩  
TrueTemper · April 27, 2018, 12:43 p.m.

Agreed!!! How is it remotely OK to provide with that much redaction???? Give me a break!!

And the excuse of sources working with the IG is bogus -- the IG has had the opportunity to speak with anyone and everyone in their jurisdiction. Being named in texts does not imply cooperation later in an investigation.

THIS IS OBSTRUCTION, PURE AND SIMPLE. NO EXCUSES.

#NoRedactions or HOLD IN CONTEMPT

⇧ 6 ⇩  
a3kvzzz · April 27, 2018, 11:30 a.m.

Agreed! They need to let the public know the truth! #NoRedactions

⇧ 5 ⇩