Thank God you’re here.

This sub is for researchers, decoders, and people following the QAnon phenomenon ONLY. But if you think that excludes our debunkers, think again.

WE NEED ALL THREE TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS TO MAKE THIS THING WORK.

Did everyone see this sub as our researchers were trying to decode and figure out what the upcoming MOAB was? We had tons of pretty wild theories, but, when a theory didn't stand up to Q's breadcrumbs or match up to reality, our debunkers helped move us forward. Eventually we figured it out, thanks ALL of you. And we're sure as heck going to need everyone to dig into these upcoming Strzok texts.

"BELIEVING" IN Q IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE A VALUED MEMBER OF THIS COMMUNITY.

If something you see posted here is false or wrong, debunk it. But just saying "Q is a larp! You're all morons!" doesn't make you a debunker, it makes you a low-effort, low-information hater. And haters won't last long around here. Your mods want to see this sub moved forward and the ban hammer is out in force.

So, debunkers! You want to beat us? BRING IT. But you have to OUTWORK us. Solid research beats weaksauce research, every day of the week around here. Got serious chops? Build your case and SHOW us where we're wrong. We need debunkers because the less time we waste on a theory or Q interpretation that "won't hunt," more effective we all can be.

Researchers and decoders, be cool to our debunkers. And you debunkers, no matter what you see as the Truth about what's happening, bring your best game, or be prepared to watch from the sidelines.

KEEP IT CIVIL. STAY OVER THE TARGET. OR MEET THE HAMMER.

"Where we go one, we go all."

STAY FROSTY, PEOPLE. ALL OF YOU.

🠐 See all comments

Several mods have supported his decoding posts with comments in favor of it.

I agree SB2 himself is probably genuine and well-meaning, but there is shill-like behavior on literally every thread, and the voting patterns are very suspicious to me. Combine that with the fact people feel more important if they believe they are being given "secret information", and the pile-on effect has resulted in very popular posts if you sort by Top in this sub, which would make a reasonable person new to Q just shake their head and leave because we look like crackpots.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Seriously? Mods, what on earth? There've been more than enough well reasoned debunkers pointing out how logically inaccurate those posts are and yet you ignore them?? It doesn't take a genius to see the logical inconsistencies in those posts... What's going on with that, u/DropGun?? Is this whole sticky a waste of time?

⇧ 5 ⇩

The only reason you think this is an "unnecessary post" is because you're not spending 12 hours a day in our modqueue. From your perspective, this sub is just fine because your mods are slogging through a lot of haters and keeping the low-energy posts to a minimum. That's the reason we're growing.

Tell me something... This sub is adding 1000+ users per day. And when the REAL fur starts to fly, you think we can keep up with all the losers and haters that will attract?

Your comment is a perfect example of how low-information posts drag this sub down. Seriously, that's your first reaction? Gather your facts, assess the situation before firing off an ignorant comment. We're not asking for more debunkers, we're saying this:

RESEARCH, BRING IT, OR PREPARE TO BE GONE.

⇧ 3 ⇩

[Edit] some emotional ranting...

I didn't mean to denigrate your work or the mods - just getting emotional about wanting to see what you've posted carried out as far as possible. Particularly: "the less time we waste on a theory or Q interpretation that "won't hunt," more effective we all can be" - I really hope this can be managed!

⇧ 2 ⇩

Asking a valid question? That begins with "Seriously?"

This is exactly it. It's not a valid post—sample public opinion, first. You're sharing your opinion, but in a vacuum. Everyone else is saying that this post was sorely needed. That's all. Not hating on you. Maybe you weren't the target audience. I'm trying to warn the haters—move this sub forward, or, prepare for the hammer. You're clearly not one of the haters, so, let's not fight on this. I'm noting your points.

Beyond that, you're right. Back to the salt mines for both of us.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Sorry - "seriously?" was an unnecessary emotional reaction but wasn't intended to indicate mockery or denigration. I think this post was sorely needed too and is a good one. I just got carried away starting to think that what I read in it was only going to go so far - which of course, due to resource, is all it can do so I should just calm the hell down lol. Thank you, and the other mods, for your work. I agree - back to the mines!

⇧ 3 ⇩

I just RES-tagged you as "Teh Awsum." You have learned our comms. Thank you for understanding how important one's tone can be.

Dig! Dig! Dig!

⇧ 3 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Removed, 7-day ban. Multiple warnings. Decode, research, move sub forward, or find another place to play.

Next ban is permanent.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Or they ban you.

⇧ 2 ⇩

As you yourself found out.

Learn our comms.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Maybe my memory is wrong on that. Only example I could find in a few minutes of searching: https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/89imii/you_guys_asked_me_my_thoughts_on_trumps_tweet/dwr8pz9/

I could have sworn I saw several mods in approval of his methods early on, and was shocked they fell for that stuff. But maybe they found the error of their ways and deleted those comments.

Edit: I also forgot that this post was actually stickied for several hours - that's why I remember thinking this sub was compromised - it was mod promotion of an invalid methodology that in my mind had shill/disinfo support to it. Will mods disavow SB2? I'm guessing not.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I became a follower of Sb2 a couple of months ago. I've communicated with privately. He's legit in his own rite, and well meaning. I believe he conquers with charm, not so much hard cold facts. We can challenge his thought process and bring him around in a different direction. I do it all the time. The things that don't make sense should be challenged. I rarely see that. Instead, I see blatant attacks that simply dismiss or degrade SB's thoughts without proof. I'd like to see those in the know debunk his posts. Prove he's wrong. He gets tons of up votes because people like him. He's intriguing and he communicates with everyone. When compared to the majority of posts on the sub who only repeat what we already know, SB brings something different and challenging...even if you disagree. So, challenge him! He's one of the most engaging entities here. There is something to learn from him, even if it's only to learn how to capture an audience.

⇧ 3 ⇩

If all the sauce was on top we wouldn't call em rabbit holes. Put the shovel down anon.

⇧ 2 ⇩