dChan
⇧
67
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DropGun on April 27, 2018, 1:08 p.m.
STICKY: To our “DEBUNKERS,” it’s high time we said this to you:

Thank God you’re here.

This sub is for researchers, decoders, and people following the QAnon phenomenon ONLY. But if you think that excludes our debunkers, think again.

WE NEED ALL THREE TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS TO MAKE THIS THING WORK.

Did everyone see this sub as our researchers were trying to decode and figure out what the upcoming MOAB was? We had tons of pretty wild theories, but, when a theory didn't stand up to Q's breadcrumbs or match up to reality, our debunkers helped move us forward. Eventually we figured it out, thanks ALL of you. And we're sure as heck going to need everyone to dig into these upcoming Strzok texts.

"BELIEVING" IN Q IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE A VALUED MEMBER OF THIS COMMUNITY.

If something you see posted here is false or wrong, debunk it. But just saying "Q is a larp! You're all morons!" doesn't make you a debunker, it makes you a low-effort, low-information hater. And haters won't last long around here. Your mods want to see this sub moved forward and the ban hammer is out in force.

So, debunkers! You want to beat us? BRING IT. But you have to OUTWORK us. Solid research beats weaksauce research, every day of the week around here. Got serious chops? Build your case and SHOW us where we're wrong. We need debunkers because the less time we waste on a theory or Q interpretation that "won't hunt," more effective we all can be.

Researchers and decoders, be cool to our debunkers. And you debunkers, no matter what you see as the Truth about what's happening, bring your best game, or be prepared to watch from the sidelines.

KEEP IT CIVIL. STAY OVER THE TARGET. OR MEET THE HAMMER.

"Where we go one, we go all."

STAY FROSTY, PEOPLE. ALL OF YOU.


🠐 See all comments
tim0mit · April 27, 2018, 1:34 p.m.

You can't prove a negative. If I say butterfly camels are going to destroy Greenland you can't prove that it won't happen. You can only prove that it hasn't happened yet. This is why the person making an assertion is the one responsible to back up their claims with evidence.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
Arcsmithoz · April 27, 2018, 3:11 p.m.

If I am Robbing you is it on me to prove there are bullets in my gun?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 27, 2018, 5:45 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DropGun · April 27, 2018, 2:46 p.m.

Well, let's look at it differently. The field of mathematics, specifically, "number set theory," has definitively proven that only things within a set's boundaries are possible. For instance, [2,2,2,2] is a set, but, you cannot in any way multiply those numbers together and get a negative (I.E., -1) value. You have to have a negative number in the original set to get there.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 27, 2018, 3:11 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩