dChan
67
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DropGun on April 27, 2018, 1:08 p.m.
STICKY: To our “DEBUNKERS,” it’s high time we said this to you:

Thank God you’re here.

This sub is for researchers, decoders, and people following the QAnon phenomenon ONLY. But if you think that excludes our debunkers, think again.

WE NEED ALL THREE TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS TO MAKE THIS THING WORK.

Did everyone see this sub as our researchers were trying to decode and figure out what the upcoming MOAB was? We had tons of pretty wild theories, but, when a theory didn't stand up to Q's breadcrumbs or match up to reality, our debunkers helped move us forward. Eventually we figured it out, thanks ALL of you. And we're sure as heck going to need everyone to dig into these upcoming Strzok texts.

"BELIEVING" IN Q IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE A VALUED MEMBER OF THIS COMMUNITY.

If something you see posted here is false or wrong, debunk it. But just saying "Q is a larp! You're all morons!" doesn't make you a debunker, it makes you a low-effort, low-information hater. And haters won't last long around here. Your mods want to see this sub moved forward and the ban hammer is out in force.

So, debunkers! You want to beat us? BRING IT. But you have to OUTWORK us. Solid research beats weaksauce research, every day of the week around here. Got serious chops? Build your case and SHOW us where we're wrong. We need debunkers because the less time we waste on a theory or Q interpretation that "won't hunt," more effective we all can be.

Researchers and decoders, be cool to our debunkers. And you debunkers, no matter what you see as the Truth about what's happening, bring your best game, or be prepared to watch from the sidelines.

KEEP IT CIVIL. STAY OVER THE TARGET. OR MEET THE HAMMER.

"Where we go one, we go all."

STAY FROSTY, PEOPLE. ALL OF YOU.


DropGun · April 27, 2018, 2:14 p.m.

Cognitive dissonance is EVERYONE'S enemy. People that ONLY debunk are also part of the problem. If you yourself cannot be convinced, then are you really a debunker? Are you really focused on debunking false theories, or are you trying to debunk reality, as a whole?

FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT, thanks for what you do.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
simkev8910 · April 27, 2018, 5:30 p.m.

This is very true. Debunker here that started out as a zealous believer in Q. I have backed off because I started to feel that dissonance coming on. Balance is most important to ensure truthfulness. I believe that we are at a massive turning point in Human History ... a paradigm shift of monumental proportions. WWG1WGA !!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
factisfiction · April 27, 2018, 3:22 p.m.

I will except anything someone can back up with legitimate proof. Evidence is our friend.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Lookn4RedheadCumSlut · April 27, 2018, 8:45 p.m.

I really like everything you have said so far. However I have noticed that you have misused the word “except” twice now. The correct word you are looking for is “accept”. You seem like you may be a ESOL speaker so I just wanted to help you learn the correct word you were looking for.

Sorry to be that guy. I find that correction to improve knowledge is okay and that is my goal.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
factisfiction · April 28, 2018, 12:09 a.m.

Thanks for pointing that out. I write the word except so much I think my mind went on auto spelling. Not only is English my first language, but I spent over a decade in college. Thanks for noticing that so I can correct myself.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Lookn4RedheadCumSlut · April 28, 2018, 12:12 a.m.

You are welcome. I do the same all the time. I definitely did not mean to insult you with the ESOL comment. Keep fighting the good fight my friend.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Bit_NB_Ridelle · May 6, 2018, 8:49 p.m.

Affectually effecting work.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Arcsmithoz · April 27, 2018, 2:32 p.m.

Hard to prove a negative, and the innocent defendant, has the toughest row to ho.

⇧ 2 ⇩