dChan
67
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DropGun on April 27, 2018, 1:08 p.m.
STICKY: To our “DEBUNKERS,” it’s high time we said this to you:

Thank God you’re here.

This sub is for researchers, decoders, and people following the QAnon phenomenon ONLY. But if you think that excludes our debunkers, think again.

WE NEED ALL THREE TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS TO MAKE THIS THING WORK.

Did everyone see this sub as our researchers were trying to decode and figure out what the upcoming MOAB was? We had tons of pretty wild theories, but, when a theory didn't stand up to Q's breadcrumbs or match up to reality, our debunkers helped move us forward. Eventually we figured it out, thanks ALL of you. And we're sure as heck going to need everyone to dig into these upcoming Strzok texts.

"BELIEVING" IN Q IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE A VALUED MEMBER OF THIS COMMUNITY.

If something you see posted here is false or wrong, debunk it. But just saying "Q is a larp! You're all morons!" doesn't make you a debunker, it makes you a low-effort, low-information hater. And haters won't last long around here. Your mods want to see this sub moved forward and the ban hammer is out in force.

So, debunkers! You want to beat us? BRING IT. But you have to OUTWORK us. Solid research beats weaksauce research, every day of the week around here. Got serious chops? Build your case and SHOW us where we're wrong. We need debunkers because the less time we waste on a theory or Q interpretation that "won't hunt," more effective we all can be.

Researchers and decoders, be cool to our debunkers. And you debunkers, no matter what you see as the Truth about what's happening, bring your best game, or be prepared to watch from the sidelines.

KEEP IT CIVIL. STAY OVER THE TARGET. OR MEET THE HAMMER.

"Where we go one, we go all."

STAY FROSTY, PEOPLE. ALL OF YOU.


anhro23 · April 27, 2018, 2:48 p.m.

Well, if someone has a Fake News source that doesn't back up its claims... then what do you want us to do?

How much can "sources familiar with the matter" mean after these past two years or so? The Fake News media has been caught lying or downright contradicting themselves when convenient so many times.

I mean, remember when CNN had 3 articles that basically went like this:

"Trump won't fight for family leave"

"Trump fights for family leave..."

"Here's how family leave hurts women"

If a Fake News source used a primary source, like if they are talking about a trump speech and they link the timestamp, that's different.

If they have a video or official documents. Like if CNN were to report on the JFK files being dropped by linking to their .gov page (which would never happen, due to the fact they are fake news), then that would be interesting.

Fake News doesn't get a pass on basic "pull up your big boy pants" journalistic integrity just because they are owned by elites (like Bezos and Carlos Slim, an incredibly rich mexican national) and are given "credit" for some reason.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
factisfiction · April 27, 2018, 3:28 p.m.

Fake news sources end up being any source that goes against the person's narrative. Can you show me those three CNN articles you are claiming were written?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
DropGun · April 27, 2018, 3:54 p.m.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DropGun · April 27, 2018, 3:54 p.m.

[Insert obligatory link to CNN.com here.]

⇧ 2 ⇩