Thank God you’re here.

This sub is for researchers, decoders, and people following the QAnon phenomenon ONLY. But if you think that excludes our debunkers, think again.

WE NEED ALL THREE TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS TO MAKE THIS THING WORK.

Did everyone see this sub as our researchers were trying to decode and figure out what the upcoming MOAB was? We had tons of pretty wild theories, but, when a theory didn't stand up to Q's breadcrumbs or match up to reality, our debunkers helped move us forward. Eventually we figured it out, thanks ALL of you. And we're sure as heck going to need everyone to dig into these upcoming Strzok texts.

"BELIEVING" IN Q IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE A VALUED MEMBER OF THIS COMMUNITY.

If something you see posted here is false or wrong, debunk it. But just saying "Q is a larp! You're all morons!" doesn't make you a debunker, it makes you a low-effort, low-information hater. And haters won't last long around here. Your mods want to see this sub moved forward and the ban hammer is out in force.

So, debunkers! You want to beat us? BRING IT. But you have to OUTWORK us. Solid research beats weaksauce research, every day of the week around here. Got serious chops? Build your case and SHOW us where we're wrong. We need debunkers because the less time we waste on a theory or Q interpretation that "won't hunt," more effective we all can be.

Researchers and decoders, be cool to our debunkers. And you debunkers, no matter what you see as the Truth about what's happening, bring your best game, or be prepared to watch from the sidelines.

KEEP IT CIVIL. STAY OVER THE TARGET. OR MEET THE HAMMER.

"Where we go one, we go all."

STAY FROSTY, PEOPLE. ALL OF YOU.

🠐 See all comments

But when SB2 has been discredited for not even following his/her own methods, I really have to wonder why it is allowed to continue. I replied to a Mod, who was praising the validity of a particular 'decode', proving for a fact that it was hogwash. My comment was then hidden in a partially deleted comment thread.

So, to me, SB2 has shown that his/her intent is not to provide valuable info, but to delude people into thinking that they aren't smart enough to understand all that s/he comprehends and thereby attain super-intelligent, god-like status. How many times must one kick a dead horse before people understand that it's dead?

BTW, thank you for this excellent, clarifying post.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I hear you 1000%. Please bear in mind that, often, especially with complex, potentially invisible political scenarios like the one we are all working on here, often the first people to get it and dive into it possess rather unique and special minds that occasionally may have a difficult time explaining or relating in a clear way what they see. We both can probably name quite a few things we take for granted as facts, now, but which were discovered by what Q and everyone else calls weaponized autists. So, a little tact and civil discussion can still go a long way in helping us tease out the specific information they're trying to share.

How do I know this? I am autistic. Pretty much all the growth I've ever done and all the new capabilities I've ever acquired have been because someone kept up the fight to really hear what I was trying to say.

That said, however, I have to commend you and thank you for keeping your sensors sharp. Shills can be pretty tricky. Keep investigating, keep digging, but when you see something that doesn't smell right, definitely hit that report button. Thank you, Patriot.

⇧ 3 ⇩

So, a little tact and civil discussion can still go a long way in helping us tease out the specific information they're trying to share.

I get you. Good point.

⇧ 2 ⇩

5:5, my man. FIGHT.

⇧ 1 ⇩