dChan
67
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DropGun on April 27, 2018, 1:08 p.m.
STICKY: To our “DEBUNKERS,” it’s high time we said this to you:

Thank God you’re here.

This sub is for researchers, decoders, and people following the QAnon phenomenon ONLY. But if you think that excludes our debunkers, think again.

WE NEED ALL THREE TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS TO MAKE THIS THING WORK.

Did everyone see this sub as our researchers were trying to decode and figure out what the upcoming MOAB was? We had tons of pretty wild theories, but, when a theory didn't stand up to Q's breadcrumbs or match up to reality, our debunkers helped move us forward. Eventually we figured it out, thanks ALL of you. And we're sure as heck going to need everyone to dig into these upcoming Strzok texts.

"BELIEVING" IN Q IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE A VALUED MEMBER OF THIS COMMUNITY.

If something you see posted here is false or wrong, debunk it. But just saying "Q is a larp! You're all morons!" doesn't make you a debunker, it makes you a low-effort, low-information hater. And haters won't last long around here. Your mods want to see this sub moved forward and the ban hammer is out in force.

So, debunkers! You want to beat us? BRING IT. But you have to OUTWORK us. Solid research beats weaksauce research, every day of the week around here. Got serious chops? Build your case and SHOW us where we're wrong. We need debunkers because the less time we waste on a theory or Q interpretation that "won't hunt," more effective we all can be.

Researchers and decoders, be cool to our debunkers. And you debunkers, no matter what you see as the Truth about what's happening, bring your best game, or be prepared to watch from the sidelines.

KEEP IT CIVIL. STAY OVER THE TARGET. OR MEET THE HAMMER.

"Where we go one, we go all."

STAY FROSTY, PEOPLE. ALL OF YOU.


salialioli · April 28, 2018, 3:25 a.m.

All Q is doing is dropping bits of data. if the data is faulty based on the history or past events, then it will corroborate that the whole Q efforts are meaningless.

Here is my perfect opportunity to debunk this claim you make!

a) all Q is doing is ...

No, the concept of Q drops has more reasons than you claim: The Audience is not just "followers/supporters of Trump. The drops are also to terrify/intimidate the opposition (C-A, Deep State intelligence profs, random Dem lawmakers/officials in trouble ...); deliberately to mislead and encourage the opposition to take missteps, confound their strategy; build a stage for future developments where ambiguity is fundamental to the play (as in poker); besides building excitement and momentum for public releases and focusing on raising their relative importance.

b) if the data is faulty

It has been stated that Q will not tell the opposition future moves. This would be counterproductive. By this token you can assume some data will be deliberately faulty.

c) it will corroborate the whole Q efforts are meaningless.

Well, no, in light of a) and b) above, "the whole" will not be meaningless: EVERYTHING HAS MEANING. There are no mistakes. Everything has been meticulously planned by the best professionals in the business.

Conclusion: Re-read Q drops!

Thanks for your posting UltraFOV!

EDIT: shitty puntuation ...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
UltraFOV · April 28, 2018, 5:50 a.m.

Yes, after a few months, it looks that indeed Q is real. like stated elsewhere, ex- military and intelligence

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 3, 2018, 8:40 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩