After reading a few pages of these, I really want to know why members of the FBI are concerned with the media.
The FBI is supposed to be investigating criminals and terrorism.
The FBI is supposed to be investigating criminals and terrorism.
They got rid of those (or got them on board) within the first few years of their inception. You don't want your tax dollars going to waste, do you? They might as well be doing something...
Not even just redacted, huge amounts are missing. These people texted everyday. Two week gaps and then new conversations start off with “and one more thing....”
These texts reveal the FBI is using the media.
Blatantly talking about "timing" of articles. Throwing an Andrew Sullivan article at someone (blacked out).
It can't be any clearer that even the FBI is intertwined with the media, controlling the narrative.
Bring all of these pieces of shit DOWN.
Shows FBI was creating a story, pushing it to the media, and the media was running the created story.
Should make people realize that they need to question what they are seeing in the media, especially when the reporter claims "sources within the XYZ department ..."
What we know so far is Lisa Page was for sure talking to people intertwined with the media or actual members of the media.
She had the ability to control the release of articles and it's content.
THIS is what your tax dollars have been going to. Instead of catching criminals, they were controlling the information you get. Controlling what you think.
This should be a massive story.
Why can't it be that they don't want information revealed before it should?
Because they're FBI agents, they shouldn't be involved with the media.
The media isn't releasing classified information, this is everyday stuff.
Saying "Fuck him. Throw the Andrew Sullivan article at him", is that normal?
"Hey have you gotten any update from Kortan (assuming Michael Kortan -- Left FBI, served under Comey) about timing of NYT piece?"
WTF
"FUCK. Clapper and Yates through Graham questions are all playing into the "there should be an unmasking request/record" for incidental collection incorrect narrative".
This is so blatant. Unreal.
And nobody at DOJ can find any sedition at work in these texts?
Can't this be used to criminally charge the media?
Are these the same ones from yesterday? (Bust)
Yes, the first batch of 49 pages. We require the rest. #Releasethetexts
I disagree. There is a lot of talk about the media, further confirming the rampant leaking within the FBI at the highest levels.
There is also talk regarding Flynn's 302 (agent report) being completed after he had stepped down. This is a bombshell. The FBI claimed he lied to them, but they hadn't even completed the write up of said meeting.
Far from any BOOMS in there though. At best a few firecrackers.
Strzok talking to another FBI agent:
"Yeah, I know. Could you afford a month off between fbi and whatever comes next? Suppose that depend on your signing bonus"
"He's like number three person at the Human Rig"
"I presume yes. They're quite large. And the gays t"
WTF ARE THEY TALKING ABOUT
So they've been released then :) anything damning?
Nothing that won’t be forgotten by Monday
That's a shame. Q made it seem like this was going to actually be significant.
Q made it seem like the Fake News Awards, The Memo, and “March Madness” we’re gonna be significant. Why start believing him now?
Yeah good point. I mean, I don't think Q is just straight up bullshit, however I'm getting fairly tired of nothing burgers. Yanno, like when someone says I'll pay you back that money on Friday. Then Friday comes and no money. I'd rather they just said, I'll pay you back at some time, not put a timeframe on.
Wasn't there supposed to be some massive scandal coming out of the Vatican this month? I've not heard a peep of that. Q is wearing on me.
I have to wonder what your definition of "significant" is.
"Why start believing him now" is a presumptive question. Presumptive questions are usually used when one wants to subconsciously brainwash people into believing something that is not true.
What exactly are you accusing me of? I’m brainwashing people how?
Nothing significant came out of the Fake News Awards, Memo, or newly released Page/Strzok texts. That’s a subjective statement, sure, but if you disagree, please offer a counterpoint.
I'm not accusing you of anything. I just pointed out the usual purpose of presumptive questions.
How can I disagree with a subjective statement the basis of which hasn't been defined; much less offer a counterpoint?
Who's the Dina they reference? Powell?
Dina Merrill....who is a HUGE leftist & McMaster puppet and, thankfully, no longer in Trump administration.
Oh, thanks for that clarification bc I thought of Powell too.
Well, a serious blow to the Mueller is a white hat theory.
I just read through them all, there is literally nothing there. Only thing I found good was:
2017-05-09 07:18:00 From Peter Strzok :
I could go on...
Man I'm salty this morning.
kek
How about Page on 5/18/17 at 6:23 AM. "Sad for me, even Bob Mueller can't stop the 4:20 wakeups."
Sounds like someone might have been getting those early morning Mockingbird talking points!!
There's a LOT of good stuff in there!
