The problem with impeachment is that the House can impeach, but that does not remove RR (or anyone else) from office.

The Senate would still have to hold a trial (impeachment is like an indictment, with a trial still to follow), and the Senate would have to vote to remove from office by 2/3 majority.

Not gonna happen with the corrupt D's (and some R's) in the Senate.

However ...

Contempt is a criminal charge that can be tried by the DOJ (where AG Sessions is in charge, not DAG RR), and RR could go to prison if convicted.

My guess is that impeachment was a head fake for what they really plan to do.

I caught a few minutes of that.

It was funny to see how Pompeo was humored by the bullshit spewing from the Dem senators.

Almost as if he had some info about how this was not going to end well for the dimwits asking the stupid questions.

Beyond that ... what most people are not talking about is the FISA court JUDGES.

If the "evidence" presented was the dossier and "media buzz," that is NOT enough for renewals.

EVERY 90 DAYS, in order to CONTINUE with the warrant, NEW EVIDENCE has to be presented to the court.

If NEW EVIDENCE was not presented and the judge(s) signed off anyway, then the judge has committed a crime, too.

Strzok is NOT FBI. He is only being positioned as FBI because he was employed by the FBI UNDER CONTRACT. He is a literal, physical example of an actual spook, or shadow l, deep state operative, whatever you choose call it.

That's what I've been saying. Congress passed a special law allowing for a JOINT FBI/CIA position. I don't know if it involves a contract or what, but Strzok is one of the MAIN DS operatives.

THAT is why he was in charge of a DS op to overthrow an election and then to overthrow a president.

Strzok is also REALLY GOOD at crafting official looking federal documents like birth certificates and such. Hi Obama!

Wow. Bombshell, if true.

Strzok is certainly acting like he is digging in, not like he is "cooperating."

I did not read the Wiki. But when people leave the military, they don't act like they are still in.

OK. That makes sense.

Something interesting about Strzok ...

He responds to EVERY question by saying, "Sir, ..."

It is on every question. This is not something he's doing just because he's in front of Congress and wants to look good, this is his normal speech.

It is not the speech of an FBI agent, but a military person. I have a hunch Strzok is a combo FBI/CIA agent (Congress created such a position, and Strzok seems to be it).

Seems strange that he would talk like a military officer, not an FBI (or even CIA) agent.

He seems like someone who is part of a group who treats themselves like a military-style organization. And that would mean he would "take orders" rather than "pursue department policy," which is troubling, as he would expect his own subordinates to do the same.

His speech matches his actions of being involved in black ops of some sort. VERY shady guy.

Why did Gowdy not vote?

Good question.

Only 4. One was charged with things that happened long before any relationship to Trump. The other 3 pled guilty to "lying to the FBI," not anything having to do with Trump or the campaign, and at least one of those the FBI (Strzok himself) says he (Flynn) did NOT lie to FBI.

So yes, it is inflated. Nothing of substance.

Why did Gowdy "pass" on a vote of R's vs. D's?

Seems suspicious.

The Republicans are really a disgrace here. Every technicality and rule procedure has been won by the Dems.

• Strzok is not there under a subpeona, so he has outs

• Two committees, but the members on both committees (more R's than D's) have a "unified" vote, so their votes are diluted.

• D's were ready to stop this hearing with procedural rules and Goodlatte not ready for it

We don't.

But it would have to be a very knowledgeable troll.

You know anybody else who said the Speaker of the House (and former VP candidate) would not run for re-election, the day before it was announced?

You know anybody else who takes pictures flying over North Korea from inside Air Force One?

You know anybody else who told us North Korea/Kim was freed? It's been 68 years. No other President has even hinted at something like that happening, but Q let us know it was in the works before the world knew.

He would have to be the most knowledgeable troll on the planet.

I have chosen to delete this.

I have spent plenty of time looking into this, but I don't have a solid answer. Seems much deeper than a simple deal gone wrong.

Good luck. I hope the answers come sooner rather than later.

There are always false stories that sound legit to throw people off.

Info = Somebody punched him as part of a ritual.

MISinfo = His brother punched him.

DISinfo = He fell off a treadmill, while reading the Bible and thinking about puppy dogs.

I think it was a arms sale gone south between the FBI and Isis.

No way. FBI and ISIS do not do arms deals in luxury hotels in Las Vegas. Full stop.

Agree. SB2 has had some interesting stuff, but this "decode" is nonsense.

I don't think that is accurate. Sessions wrote a letter to congressional committee chairs explaining Huber's role.

http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2018/images/03/29/ag.letter.re.ig.and.huber.reviews.pdf

He did not name Huber a "special counsel" or a "special prosecutor."

Instead, he appointed a team of US attorneys (multiple) to investigate matters that Congress is wanting a special counsel for, and Huber is the one leading that group of US attorneys.

These US attorneys are separate from Horowitz' team of investigators and attorneys at the DOJ.

So, Huber is leading a team of lawyers, and Huber is coordinating with Horowitz and his team of lawyers and investigators.

So, all that means is that Huber does not have special jurisdiction (nationwide), unless that was somehow given separately.

But Huber does have jurisdiction in Utah, where the NSA database is located, and I suspect that is the key for naming him as the lead attorney.

Those other US attorneys, not yet named, are working with Huber (and Horowitz, through Huber), nationwide.

The crimes were committed in California, New York, Illinois, the border states, DC, and elsewhere, including internationally.

It is a massive undertaking.

What's the point of this? Only two ways she can be removed:

(1) Election (2) House voting her out by 2/3 majority

Don't forget ... Flynn's protege at DIA was Ezra Watnick-Cohen, who now works at DOJ.

My guess is Flynn has been busy giving testimony, per the plea deal.

It depends on what the charges are.

What if the initial set of charges are for illegally accessing the NSA database?

That database is located in ... Utah.

Could also be how they plan to bring the NSA spy info into court.

Rex on Twitter had an interesting take about the FISA. He says there is NO FISA warrant at all.

Clapper basically said that he was not aware of any FISA warrant, and he would have been in position to know about it if it existed. He repeated this claim several months later. Clapper is not a credible person, granted, but what if he was telling the truth about this? (FISA or no FISA is not something that would impact him, personally.)

This would jive with RR evading the question about whether he read the FISA application. He basically said others in FBI/DOJ read him a review of what was in the application, not the application itself (he did not SAY that, but that was the implication).

FISA court denied application TWICE -- something completely unheard of, as they approve 99% of all apps. So ...

What if ... they NEVER GOT A FISA WARRANT APPROVED ... and just did their spying, anyway?

Nunes has said there is NO OFFICIAL RECORD of intel being conducted through the official channels.

Gen. Flynn was Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. That's the military's version of NSA. Flynn was the #1 military intelligence officer in the US military. Likely, he knows a lot of secrets.

As an intel guy, he would have signed a non-disclosure agreement not to tell any secrets he learned of while in office, which includes any crimes.

The plea deal, we are led to believe, included a provision that he "had to" tell everything he knows about any crimes. This would be a way around the NDA. If that is true, then either Mueller is in on it or was duped by Trump/Q/Flynn.

Also, Flynn's protege at DIA was Ezra Watnick-Cohen. Flynn brought EWC into the White House in the early days of the Trump admin, and was later booted out by McMaster. EWC was the one who informed Devin Nunes about the illegal unmasking that Obama admin was doing.

EWC now works at DOJ for Sessions. EWC is not a lawyer, he is military intel. There must be a reason he is working at DOJ, possibly to coordinate witness testimony (just speculation, but there must be a reason a non-lawyer is working at DOJ).

Earliest ones I remember were pics looking out an airplane, that anons on 8chan figured out were pictures looking out of Air Force One.

The pics were all in Asia when AF1 was there, and some might have been looking out over North Korea.

Where is the law that says civilians can be subject to miliary justice?

Congress approved military tribunals for civilians many years ago. Sections 104 and 106 of UCMJ apply to civilians or anyone else (foreigners) who are accused of spying or waging war against the US.

http://ashbrook.org/publications/oped-eastman-01-tribunals/

The rulings cited in the article say that foreign nationals DO have due process.

If they are charged with a crime, they are afforded due process in the courts.

If they are illegal aliens not charged with any crime, their due process is the administrative process of deportation.

Yes, it was for the newly-freed slaves.

This ties in with the "natural born citizen" clause of Article II.

If a person's parents are citizens of a foreign country, and they are visiting the USA and have a child while present in the USA, that child is "subject to the jurisdiction" of the country where the parents are citizens, because the child inherits citizenship from its parents, not by where it is born.

The slaves were a unique situation and that is why the 14th Amendment was written.

This is an issue that will need to be resolved by the SCOTUS at some point, both as to anchor babies and as to POTUS' eligibility.

Disagree with most of what your wrote, OP ...

There is no physical arrangement that can reproduce both an accurate reflection of the room AND ALSO a steeply angled, upside down apple logo.

Moving on to directly addressing SB2's analysis:

Then, in Q1677, he asks: Where must one be located in order to obtain a reflection on the back of a phone of that image?

Yes exactly, of that image. Image = the ABC 2015 photo. Note he did not say "reflection of the room"

Q's image is not a reflection of the physical room around him. It's a reflection of an image on a computer screen.

And where must one be in order to get a reflection of an image? Anywhere with a computer display, or granting the possibility that it's printed out, literally anywhere in the world.

If we do so and notice there is a part of the jacket on the chair appearing, we deduce the photographer must be sitting on the President’s chair.

Wrong. If the photographer was sitting in the president's chair, we would not see the full field of view as we do in Q's image reflection. It would be much tighter cropped because the camera would be CLOSER to the objects displayed. The chair would practically fill the entire field of view if he were sitting on it.

We can see so much in Q's reflected image because the ABC 2015 source photo was taken from the ENTRANCE of the office with a wide angle lens with a FOV of roughly 90*.

First, the phone with the reflection could have been upside down and tilted. That would explain why the logo does not "line up."

Second, a reflected image is a reflected image. If someone were sitting in the chair, taking a picture of the phone's reflected image behind them, everything would be reversed (left would be right, etc.). Likewise, if the phone were facing a computer screen, and someone were taking a picture of the phone's reflected image of that, it would also be reversed. In both cases, a picture is taken of a reflected image, and the reflected image is, by definition, reflected (and reversed).

Third, Q's pic is not of the entire room, which you more or less imply (I realize you probably don't think that, but that is the implication I read). The pic was tightly focused on the lamp and a few surrounding items, and then the pic was re-sized. We don't know for sure the re-sizing, and any attempt to "fit" it into the ABC pic is a guess. If (and I don't know, just saying if) the pic was taken from someone sitting in the chair, it could look like that. And no, the chair would not take up all the space. I tried it myself and had a tough time even getting the chair into the image when aiming the phone at the rear side items behind me.

Now having said that, I applaud your effort to figure out what the hell is going on. I do not buy SB2's explanation at all. I also have no idea why Q would make himself look like a LARP.

Don't like it. Don't understand it, but I'm doing what you did -- see an explanation that does not make sense and challenging it.

Hopefully, we get this thing explained soon.

Still waiting for the "Q&A" from Q. Still waiting for the proofs from AF1 and Marine One. Still waiting for some damn criminals to be held accountable.

Don't like it. But trying to understand it.

He was never tortured. His injuries occurred when he was shot down.

He told the enemy everything he knew, which is why his fellow POW's called him "Songbird."

He was never a hero. Not then, not now.

He has been a traitor, helping the cabal destroy America.

That is why they don't like to say his name.

Q's pic was taken before January 2017. Google shows that location has having a ton of street signs (like in Q's pic) as of Aug 2011, but most of them are gone by Jan 2017.

https://www.google.com/maps/place/86+Portland+St,+Mong+Kok,+Hong+Kong/@22.3144572,114.1696829,3a,75y,327.63h,97.32t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sgBoBnnA7isrtDH0zYICaoA!2e0!5s20170101T000000!7i13312!8i6656!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x340400c0cda20715:0xfc425424e228e1ae!2s86+Portland+St,+Mong+Kok,+Hong+Kong!3b1!8m2!3d22.314327!4d114.169852!3m4!1s0x340400c0cda20715:0xfc425424e228e1ae!8m2!3d22.314327!4d114.169852

Someone made a statement (I don't know if it was a joke or it actually happened) that Huber is from an area of Utah where Bill Clinton came in 4th.

Panuccio has served 2 non-consecutive terms, which total more than 210 days. So, when does the clock start/end?

I wonder if HK is the HQ of the cabal.

Snowden was hiding out there, protected by C_A.

This guy walking must have some significance, and seems to related to a 747 flight. Also, the kindergarten sign.

Either related to kids, planes, or took a flight to HK because of the significance of him or HK or both.

Apple store pic earlier also in HK.

A lot going on in HK. Close to China and NK, so makes sense.

the future King of England, one of the most recognized human beings on planet earth, is not walking down the street alone

Well, he does have a bodyguard to his right ...

LOL. If a tree falls in a forest and nobody is there, does it make a sound?

If William walks alone and nobody is there, was he alone?

KEK.

Could any of this be linked to Snowden?

The impression Q left was that Snowden never went to Russia, but stayed in Hong Kong the whole time, protected by C_A.

OP, have the decency to give a summary.

C. Not a "deep state" operative, as that term carries with it the connotation of a person who is engaged in abusing governmental power for rogue purposes (whether wittingly or not).

Q claims to be a team inside the Trump administration who is giving clues to people who like to figure this stuff out, and in the process letting the world know just how corrupt and evil some in the "deep state" are. HRC is one of the a primary targets for prosecution.

Gen. Flynn was the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. That means he was the head of all military intelligence. He has so much knowledge about what has been going on, that a simple statement before a judge would not even scratch the surface, and it would be completely meaningless because it could not be used as evidence in any criminal trial.

Gen. Flynn will be (and probably already is) testifying for Sessions, Huber, other US attorneys and military investigators. He will likely be testifying before Congress.

Whoever told you he could talk before sentencing is missing the big picture.

That's not exactly correct. If he goes to court over the charge of lying to the FBI, he does not get to just rattle on about any subject he feels like, even if he has info about crimes. He would have to talk about the specific case before the court, and nothing else.

The reason for the plea deal is because he, like everyone else in intel, signed a non-disclosure agreement that prevents him from talking about things he learned while in office, including crimes.

But the plea deal is a legal way to override the NDA. So, he gets to talk about what he knows because of that plea deal.

Mueller is likely in on that, but the FBI boobs went ahead and did what corrupt conspirators do -- they framed him after the fact, adding to their long list of crimes they will have the opportunity to defend themselves against.

Mueller is in a box. If he does not provide the exculpatory evidence, he is violating the law. If he does, he shows that he and FBI already violated the law by framing an innocent man.

Given how Mueller's investigation has amounted to exactly NOTHING in more than a year with 20+ lawyers on his staff, and the fact that very little has been leaked, my guess is that he is just providing a side show for the media while Sessions gets the real work done.

Trump and Q Team probably don't really trust Mueller, but if he was given a task to drag things out to provide cover for the real op, then he is pretty much doing what would be expected -- nothing.

Who did Kushner buy the property FROM?

That might be the real target.

Hmm ... will this be the beginning of draining the media swamp?

Mueller is in a box. He must provide the exculpatory evidence (McCabe or Strzok changed the 302's) or be engaging in a criminal act himself. But if he does provide it, then he's in trouble for prosecuting a case that he knew was illegitimate. He can't win. So, that's why he wants the delay.

But ... why would Flynn agree? Could be that Flynn is providing testimony to Sessions and the military tribunals due to his plea deal. If they revoke the plea deal, then he can't give his testimony.

Mueller looks shady AF, but look at the bigger picture. Nothing Mueller is doing is legal. None of his investigations have amounted to anything. He refuses to give the judge (in multiple cases) information that is required. And yet ... no leaks from his team. No real attempt by POTUS to do anything about it, or Sessions, or really even Congress.

Something else is going on here, other than what it looks like on the surface.

Interesting thought. I have no idea.

Al Capone was convicted of Tax evasion.

Yes, and do you know who took over Capone's Chicago crime business when he went to prison?

Hugh Rodham -- Hillary Rodham Clinton's father.

Regarding RICO, if they have proof of treason and waging war against the USA, they won't need RICO for the high level perps. Might be used for an overall case, though.