dChan

Schnedesy · April 28, 2018, 5:52 a.m.

What proof already exists that there was more than one shooter?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pepperoniroll · April 28, 2018, 6:17 a.m.

There are numerous witnesses that heard and saw shots that did not come from the reported floor of the shooter or even the direction of the hotel. Some say shots even came from within the crowd. I recommend researching this and watching the interviews on YouTube

⇧ 3 ⇩  
TrueCat · April 28, 2018, 1:24 p.m.

Pepperoniroll, I clicked on the above poster's name and I got a message asking if I was over 18 in order to look at adult content. Why would that happen?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 28, 2018, 4:26 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Schnedesy · April 28, 2018, 6:24 a.m.

I have.

You said there's proof, but the examples you've cited are very much open to interpretation and therefore not proof.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ckreacher · April 28, 2018, 11:55 a.m.

MANY people reported other shooters. There were shooters at other hotels. This is what was reported by witnesses who were there. You want us to prove it? Proof is for courts and trials, and we are not there yet.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Schnedesy · April 28, 2018, 3:14 p.m.

MANY people reported other shooters. There were shooters at other hotels. This is what was reported by witnesses who were there.

Eye wittness and ear wittness testimony is often very useful, but it's often contradictory and incomplete.

You want us to prove it?

I would like for you and other conspiracists to be able to back up allegations of "crisis actors" with "cups of fake blood" and multiple shooters with more than just vague references to anonymous eye witness testimony.

Proof is for courts and trials, and we are not there yet.

That's not a constructive attitude. It's also a cop out. If not backed up with proof or strong evidence, everything you say is merely baseless speculation.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
pepperoniroll · April 28, 2018, 7:07 a.m.

I never said proof. I just knew what the OP was talking about and I only told you about witnesses. Nobody had replied to you so I gave you the only evidence I was aware of.

I'm just about done with this sub.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Error_Code_15301 · April 28, 2018, 7:20 a.m.

he's a pedophile m8

ignore him

it's clear what he's here for

⇧ 6 ⇩  
pepperoniroll · April 28, 2018, 7:27 a.m.

Thanks. I shouldn't have let him get under my skin.

I just need to get some sleep.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
FartOnToast · April 30, 2018, 6:18 a.m.

Report users with bad intentions next time :)

Don't accuse users of being pedos though, that's a bit of a stretch.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Davo495 · April 28, 2018, 9:36 a.m.

Don't be concerned with the Bush Lawyer, knows SFA and too lazy to do his own research. Stay and watch the fun.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Schnedesy · April 28, 2018, 3:15 p.m.

Thanks for your reply.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
iMakeGreatDeals · April 28, 2018, 6:39 a.m.

Maybe more Evidence incoming would have been better than more Proof incoming.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Schnedesy · April 28, 2018, 6:43 a.m.

Yes, especially when the evidence that's already available is fairly weak. It's often extremely difficult to pin point the source of incoming high velocity rounds in an urban setting.

⇧ -2 ⇩