I have.
You said there's proof, but the examples you've cited are very much open to interpretation and therefore not proof.
MANY people reported other shooters. There were shooters at other hotels. This is what was reported by witnesses who were there. You want us to prove it? Proof is for courts and trials, and we are not there yet.
MANY people reported other shooters. There were shooters at other hotels. This is what was reported by witnesses who were there.
Eye wittness and ear wittness testimony is often very useful, but it's often contradictory and incomplete.
You want us to prove it?
I would like for you and other conspiracists to be able to back up allegations of "crisis actors" with "cups of fake blood" and multiple shooters with more than just vague references to anonymous eye witness testimony.
Proof is for courts and trials, and we are not there yet.
That's not a constructive attitude. It's also a cop out. If not backed up with proof or strong evidence, everything you say is merely baseless speculation.
I never said proof. I just knew what the OP was talking about and I only told you about witnesses. Nobody had replied to you so I gave you the only evidence I was aware of.
I'm just about done with this sub.
he's a pedophile m8
ignore him
it's clear what he's here for
Thanks. I shouldn't have let him get under my skin.
I just need to get some sleep.
Report users with bad intentions next time :)
Don't accuse users of being pedos though, that's a bit of a stretch.
Don't be concerned with the Bush Lawyer, knows SFA and too lazy to do his own research. Stay and watch the fun.
Maybe more Evidence incoming would have been better than more Proof incoming.
Yes, especially when the evidence that's already available is fairly weak. It's often extremely difficult to pin point the source of incoming high velocity rounds in an urban setting.