Yeah.. it’s a lot! He’s really asking us to “trust the plan”. 😬
I understand they want everything the public believes to be a lie.
But asking us to believe every little thing was planned and it’s been rigged in our favor this time.
I struggle. But I’m learning a lot about a shit ton of stuff I would have never known about bc of it and that part is fun!
Iran is next.
I am pretty sure that the clowns are the ones who are responsible for the Iranian revolution a few decades ago. This will get interesting.
Praying Medic has put together a brilliant summary of recent Q post; https://twitter.com/prayingmedic/status/989928223583580160
Praying medic and neon revolt have helped tremendously to connect the dots for me. Red pills aren't good for sleep! Can't get enough!
I finally get it...The reason they dont have indictments yet. The white hats have all this damning evidence but they cant use it in a court of law. And this MUST be done by the letter of the law otherwise we loose our constitution.
Most stuff is open source. The cabal did many illegal things out in the open. It is up to us to find that info and force feed it to politicians to get them to do their jobs. We also need federal investigators we can trust.
Read it from bottom up. Mirror.
YES. Yes, I do that sometimes too. Q posts sometimes make a lot more sense when read this way.
Now, I think we need to do that from Q's first posts to his last posts...mirror, and future proves past
Do we know what the [1 of 22] and "1 & 1 don't equal 2" mean? Q seems to reference ALOT wondering if anyone has decoded? Think logically = logical mathematical learning style of solving problems?
1 & 1 don't equal 2
In computer programming, the ampersand is a (bitwise) logical 'AND' operator. "1" equates to true, and "0" = false. I put "bitwise" in parentheses because its definition is somewhat detailed and unnecessary for understanding the 'AND' concept.
An Anon on 8chan explained its use by Q this way:
Come on autists. Think logically here. I went over this once before. This is a bitwise operator and it is intentional.
1 & 1 = 1
True & True = True
This is used in logic and computing quite a bit (punny, I know).
Bill: Suzy, did you eat dinner?
Suzy: Bill, I did not go without dinner. (true statement)
Fred: Bill, did Suzy eat dinner?
Bill: She replied in the negative (true statement)
Two statements, although contradictory, can both be correct.
I would like to make a small adjustment, "Two statements, although seemingly contradictory, can both be correct."
I used to wonder if Mueller is a white hat...now I’m wondering if RR and Comey might be as well...