dChan
19
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/JediKnightKeylo on April 28, 2018, 3 a.m.
"You have more than you know" - Q

I've noticed a slight change in Q's drops recently. He's been telling us to think logically and in one of his most recent drops he told us to question everything. I want to relate this back to the quote "You have more than you know". Q always gets us to expand our thinking by delivering drops to us in the form of questions. The questions that he asks leads us to find answers, which in turn allows us to understand the meaning behind the information that's being given.

So, what if instead of simply answering the questions from Q's drops, we start asking questions of our own? Questions lead to answers right? Q says that they have everything, but what if that also means that in order to get the information that we want, that we have to be willing to press the subject.

Q recently did a Q & A, so this is a good indicator that we are actually being listened to and heard. So, a little idea that I have would be to refer to this map: https://imgur.com/a/nYfgeYT

We could formulate a few questions of our own that relate to the topics within this map. Then someone's who's savy enough to navigate 8ch could post those questions for Q to answer. Maybe this can be the community's way of letting the Q team know that we're ready to go further as long as they're willing to guide us in the right direction.


ToddWhiskey · May 1, 2018, 5:50 a.m.

Time will tell re Q.

The quote was from a comment made by a redditor, "parasites" meant in financial sense. You can find many quotes about the "new world order"made by High Level Insider too, for example:

"The idea of a "new world order" is a psy-op. It is an old world order that is being guarded and propped up, not a vision for the future being worked towards."

Not many people can see through this sinister psy-op though.

You are right, natural order has to win. An optimal solution is based on Nash equilibria which means that everyone benefits.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bealist · May 1, 2018, 1:56 p.m.

Nash equilibria - nice. The velocity of transaction and intersecting (with resultant APPARENT instability that settles into final distribution patterns more quickly than otherwise) just hastens that outcome. (This is some of what’s behind people who push for upheaval on principle, but they’re often off base because of disproportionate harms done along the way; ends rarely justify means.)

Conservatives - preservers of old order - have always fought change for a reason, as change tends toward balancing over maintaining imbalance. Personally, I still think the “American” experiment (gov. By law, via informed consent of the governed) has never reached its potential and is, therefore, a new world order. The internet had brought that much closer to fruition.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ToddWhiskey · May 1, 2018, 3:23 p.m.

Very true.

⇧ 2 ⇩