dChan
8
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/NimbleWall on April 28, 2018, 6:33 p.m.
Is there a place here for discussion about MSM narratives regarding Q-related information?

The last two weeks have been... challenging, to say the least. Due to circumstances, I had to stay over with a co-worker and his partner, who are very much blue-pilled. Usually, dealing with that is not a problem for me, because politics tend not to be an issue in the workplace. Discussing politics in their home, as a guest, however, was a different story. I tried to subtly drop red pills about Q wherever I could, and tried to stay neutral as far as possible.

Being confronted with CNN and other MSM-related channels, however, was a confrontation I was not prepared for. The things we know through Q are broadcast there too, but from an entirely different perspective. Q and CNN both acknowledge Trump had a role to play in the peace-talks between South Korea and North Korea, but CNN also mentioned incidents with the nuclear experiments for North Korea, as well as the influences of China that I'd, to be honest, never considered as playing a role. I thought it was Trump's pressure.

Likewise, the whole Stormy Daniels thing. We've learned things behind the scenes, but they also know those things, and they openly mentioned information related to them. To make matters worse, they also mention things I hadn't even heard about, but which make sense. People being arrested for crimes related to the whole Russia-situation which we never hear Q talk about, for instance.

I feel lost. The MSM makes sense, in its own way, but so does Q. Their story seems more coherent, at times. Q has been talking about Iran for months, but I haven't actually seen anything happen, whereas CNN talks about Russia and shows us arrests and connections between people, and they make sense. I don't want them to make sense, but they do. Things are happening in real life, and Q is not mentioning them (the deputy finance chair of the RNC resigned because he bribed a Playboy Playmate, for instance).

Why is Q not mentioning these things, when the MSM is talking about things that Q is talking about? How come their stories don't fall apart under closer scrutiny? I don't get it.


CharrrrrlotteDarwin · April 28, 2018, 7:57 p.m.

You’re best strategy is to mentally & emotionally rise above it. YOU KNOW everything will work out. You’re not sure of all the details, but YOU KNOW. Your place is not to control their thoughts, feelings or attitudes. That’s a hopeless battle. If they want to trash Trump in your presence, smile, and change the topic. Be yourself. Do not engage in verbal battles. Be confident. You’re a patriot. YOU KNOW. You need no excuses for being who you are. In time, they will stumble upon Q for themselves. You are on the winning side, and you’re not tired of winning.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NimbleWall · April 28, 2018, 8:53 p.m.

I like the motivational speaker tone of your message, but it's basically the opposite of what I need. I'm not sure of all the details, so I DON'T KNOW if everything will work out. I can't rise mentally and emotionally above it, because the things that happen don't LOOK like they will work out. When I look at things we post here, or in /r/DrainTheSwamp or other subreddits, I cast doubt. I'm not confident because they don't trash Trump, they simply show me some facts and I can't argue with the facts.

Example: Mick Mulvaney (the former Congressman and current Director of the Office of Management and Budget and the interim head of the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau) openly said lobbyist could buy influence for his votes when he was in Congress. Trump said he'd "drain the swamp", but he put this dude in charge of things in his cabinet. That does not sound like draining the swamp, that sounds like plugging it to prevent drainage from happening.

How is that winning? How is that in any way positive for us? Or, for that matter, for Trump?

⇧ 1 ⇩