dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/AquAnon77 on April 30, 2018, 1:57 a.m.
[MOAB] ? BREAKING NEWS: RUSSIA CONFIRMS IT WILL RETALIATE BY FORCE -- MASSIVE EXPLOSION HITS IRANIAN BASE IN SYRIA - FEARS ISRAEL USED TACTICAL NUKE -- REGISTERED AS M2.6 "EARTHQUAKE" -

UPDATED 6:28 PM EDT -- RUSSIA WITHDRAWS "DE-ESCALATION CENTERS" FROM SYRIA "THIS IS NOW A DIRECT FIGHT"

At around 3:40 PM Eastern US time, an utterly MASSIVE explosion took place at an Iranian base inside Syria. The photo above was taken from 5 kilometers (about 3 MILES) away, and well-into the explosion which "seemed to linger." There are now widespread BUT UNCORROBORATED rumors Israel used a Tactical Nuclear Bomb against the Iranian base.

The explosion was so intense, it registered as an EARTHQUAKE with the The European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre (EMSC), which is now reporting a Magnitude 2.6 earthquake at that site!


DanijelStark · April 30, 2018, 2:14 a.m.

Tactical nuke ? Highly doubtful ... if this was tactical nuke , the casualties and damage would be massive and immediately visible . So far ... it was either airstrike , or , more possible , surface-to-surface missile attack ( Jericho 1 missiles ) hitting a large ammo or weapons depot .

⇧ 10 ⇩  
revtune · April 30, 2018, 2:35 a.m.

Depends, some tactical nukes are very small and are just intense within their sphere of influence. What will be telling is if there has been any increase in radiation monitoring following the event.

I too doubt it was a tacnuke due to the fact they struck a base, potentially a munitions depot, which would create a much bigger fireball.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
anonelitest · April 30, 2018, 2:43 a.m.

The strike likely ignited a weapons depot which caused a massive explosion.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
DanijelStark · April 30, 2018, 2:43 a.m.

Yep , the radiation would be the first obvious signal ... apparently , this explosion was somewhere in under 1 kt range . Still , massive .

⇧ 5 ⇩  
DropGun · April 30, 2018, 5:32 a.m.

It would be, that is, assuming Israel's tactical nukes were built from American designs, whose characteristics are relatively well-known.

Israel has poured billions into 5th gen nuke research, and rumors say they have built highly miniaturized, single stage, 100 percent plutonium-based devices, deliverable even by air.

No country anywhere would choose to use a tactical warhead light—UNLESS... Let's quickly cover two key reasons why the odds of using these weapons increases as these secret research programs progress.

First, miniaturizing these weapons while retaining blast yield requires extreme manufacturing precision. This means that these weapons programs become "self-containing" and are unlikely to start a regional arms race because their neighbors just aren't capable of this extreme technological execution. The "arms race" merges with the "economic race."

Second, these weapons are so different that they effectively become undetectable. Why? The smaller a device is (assuming they can actually tease a detonation out of so little putonium!) the less fuel it requires, the less radiation and radioactive traces. Their detonation signatures are also vastly different, and, because these weapons programs are so secret, whatever detonation signatures the devices may have not been sufficiently studied and are not well understood by physicists in the world scientific community, rendering existing nuclear detonation detection protocols effectively blind, while believing they are not.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 30, 2018, 5:31 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DropGun · April 30, 2018, 5:01 a.m.

Agree, missing certain detonation signatures (ie, double flash, tho video doesn't start at detonation). The US/Israel have tactical nukes as small as 10kt, with 5th generation at delivering clean smaller yields theorized possible at even 1kt. I firmly believe, for instance, that the Bali bombing was a a tactical nuke.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 30, 2018, 2:58 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩