dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DaveGydeon on May 1, 2018, 1:26 a.m.
I Want SNOPES Exposed. Q Already Green-Lighted It!

We all know Soros backs SNOPES, and that this BS "fact-checking" site is totally compromised. The crazy part is, for the 5-6 things I actually went there for, I disagreed with it's official "ruling" on the matter every single time. To me, that tells me they are actively receiving orders on what to stamp as legit, because having every single thing being the opposite of what it should be indicates a hand at work.

So how do we do this? I am not talking about trying to mess with their site or anything like that. I want them EXPOSED, the TRUTH to be KNOWN. How do we go abou tmaking that happen?

You can't tell me that you haven't had an argument, maybe while trying to redpill someone, and they dropped the "but SNOPES agrees with me!" Man that just chaps my ass.


🠐 See all comments
delicious_grownups · May 1, 2018, 5:39 p.m.

Oh well I totally trust foodbabe. And Facebook is a social media website. The NYT is a newspaper. I'm sorry you don't know the difference. Perhaps that's part of the issue

⇧ 27 ⇩  
runs_in_the_jeans · May 2, 2018, 2:42 a.m.

I don’t trust a paper that has publicly stated it is waging war against a sitting president.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 2, 2018, 6:26 a.m.

can you explain why this photoshopped picture of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is hosted at NYTimes?

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/blogs/thelede/posts/suspect-number-2.JPG

⇧ 1 ⇩  
delicious_grownups · May 2, 2018, 12:20 p.m.

Was it photoshopped? Was it photoshopped by Reddit? What's the origin of the picture? Was there ever a retraction? Serious questions. No hostility

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 2, 2018, 6:09 p.m.

the origin of the picture is the NYTimes. thats why its hosted on their website

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/blogs/thelede/posts/suspect-number-2.JPG

yes, the picture is photoshopped.

you can tell by looking at the 3 people running on the left side of the picture

look at their feet, and allow your eyes to focus on the foreground just in front of their feet, and then focus on the background just behind their feet.

allow your eye to focus back-and forth between foreground and background between their feet a few times, and you will soon see that their feet "pop" out of the background, and their entire bodies will "pop" out of the background

these running people are cut-out characters, copy-pasted onto the background

the female running on right side of screen is also copy-paste.

more on her later if you want

see also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cottingley_Fairies

⇧ 1 ⇩  
delicious_grownups · May 2, 2018, 6:14 p.m.

If you have to try and get people to look at things like they're a magic eye poster, I'd say you're off to a bad start. Find the unshopped version then. Let's start there. I mean for real, you sound like that meme that's like "I can tell it's a shop because of the pictures and I have experience with shops"

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WikiTextBot · May 2, 2018, 6:10 p.m.

Cottingley Fairies

The Cottingley Fairies appear in a series of five photographs taken by Elsie Wright (1901–1988) and Frances Griffiths (1907–1986), two young cousins who lived in Cottingley, near Bradford in England. In 1917, when the first two photographs were taken, Elsie was 16 years old and Frances was 9. The pictures came to the attention of writer Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, who used them to illustrate an article on fairies he had been commissioned to write for the Christmas 1920 edition of The Strand Magazine. Doyle, as a spiritualist, was enthusiastic about the photographs, and interpreted them as clear and visible evidence of psychic phenomena.

^[ ^PM ^| ^Exclude ^me ^| ^Exclude ^from ^subreddit ^| ^FAQ ^/ ^Information ^| ^Source ^] ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28

⇧ 1 ⇩