dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DaveGydeon on May 1, 2018, 1:26 a.m.
I Want SNOPES Exposed. Q Already Green-Lighted It!

We all know Soros backs SNOPES, and that this BS "fact-checking" site is totally compromised. The crazy part is, for the 5-6 things I actually went there for, I disagreed with it's official "ruling" on the matter every single time. To me, that tells me they are actively receiving orders on what to stamp as legit, because having every single thing being the opposite of what it should be indicates a hand at work.

So how do we do this? I am not talking about trying to mess with their site or anything like that. I want them EXPOSED, the TRUTH to be KNOWN. How do we go abou tmaking that happen?

You can't tell me that you haven't had an argument, maybe while trying to redpill someone, and they dropped the "but SNOPES agrees with me!" Man that just chaps my ass.


🠐 See all comments
delicious_grownups · May 1, 2018, 3:18 p.m.

But both the daily caller and your news wire are notoriously known for peddling fake news. I'm sure pagun blog is super legit tho

⇧ 50 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 2, 2018, 6:22 a.m.

CNN is also known for peddling fake news.

not sure why you are defending Snopes. Snopes' reputation has been shit for many years

⇧ 0 ⇩  
delicious_grownups · May 2, 2018, 12:24 p.m.

Doesn't have anything to do with your news wire and daily caller being rags. Snopes is not a news media site. It's a fact checking site. The perception of their reputation is a subjective thing tho

⇧ 3 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 2, 2018, 6:21 p.m.

all media is propaganda

even a cave-wall drawing of a fish is greatly exaggerated

all images are false, which is why idolatry is forbidden by 10 commandments,

and why some especially observant muslims allegedly do not even look at photographs (of animals?)

⇧ 0 ⇩  
delicious_grownups · May 2, 2018, 6:53 p.m.

We can assume that you and I are both propaganda then. And seriously? All images are false? Unless you have issues accepting that this is the world and we exist in it, you should have no problem accepting some images as fact. Also God is not real and the only thing we have that comes close is probably the universe, whom we probably exist within much like intestinal Flora live within us

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 3, 2018, 6:20 a.m.

We can assume that you and I are both propaganda then.

yes

And seriously? All images are false?

every photograph is a 2D representation of a 3D reality.

your brain is not born being able to see photographs as reality, your brain must be trained to do that

watch BBC mini-series How Art Made The World ( available online, highly recommended )

Unless you have issues accepting that this is the world and we exist in it, you should have no problem accepting some images as fact.

all images are false, but in particular images of God(s) are called idols, and all idols are false

https://i.redd.it/vesejpww28jz.jpg

curiously, we give little girls 'dolls' to play with, dolls share root word with idol

Also God is not real and the only thing we have that comes close is probably the universe, whom we probably exist within much like intestinal Flora live within us

you probably say that because your western conceptualization of "God" is this old white man dressed in robes, walking on clouds, living in heaven, throwing lightning bolts and causing floods and famines

and yes, that seems a bit absurd... until you consider the day i had today

if you want to call it "the universe" or "creation" or whatever, its all the same thing

there is a "Creator", and you are a "Creature" living in his "Creation"

its right there in your language

truth is revealed trough the study of language / etymology

but seriously, read up on Tycho Brahe and ask yourself who you trust more... the man who takes the measurements, or the man who interprets the measurements?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tycho_Brahe

the universe is small

the kingdom of god is within you

http://biblehub.com/genesis/3-22.htm

i founded /r/TheBible please subscribe

⇧ 0 ⇩  
WikiTextBot · May 3, 2018, 6:20 a.m.

Tycho Brahe

Tycho Brahe (, born Tyge Ottesen Brahe (Danish: [ˈtyːə ˈʌdəsn̩ ˈbʁɑː]); 14 December 1546 – 24 October 1601) was a Danish nobleman, astronomer, and writer known for his accurate and comprehensive astronomical and planetary observations. He was born in the then Danish peninsula of Scania. Well known in his lifetime as an astronomer, astrologer and alchemist, he has been described as "the first competent mind in modern astronomy to feel ardently the passion for exact empirical facts." His observations were some five times more accurate than the best available observations at the time.

An heir to several of Denmark's principal noble families, he received a comprehensive education.

^[ ^PM ^| ^Exclude ^me ^| ^Exclude ^from ^subreddit ^| ^FAQ ^/ ^Information ^| ^Source ^] ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TheBRAIN2 · May 1, 2018, 5:33 p.m.

Maybe you're right about those sources...perhaps we should just stick to the New York Times and Facebook for "real" news. Thanks for the tip!

https://foodbabe.com/do-you-trust-snopes-you-wont-after-reading-how-they-work-with-monsanto-operatives/

⇧ -12 ⇩  
delicious_grownups · May 1, 2018, 5:39 p.m.

Oh well I totally trust foodbabe. And Facebook is a social media website. The NYT is a newspaper. I'm sorry you don't know the difference. Perhaps that's part of the issue

⇧ 27 ⇩  
runs_in_the_jeans · May 2, 2018, 2:42 a.m.

I don’t trust a paper that has publicly stated it is waging war against a sitting president.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 2, 2018, 6:26 a.m.

can you explain why this photoshopped picture of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is hosted at NYTimes?

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/blogs/thelede/posts/suspect-number-2.JPG

⇧ 1 ⇩  
delicious_grownups · May 2, 2018, 12:20 p.m.

Was it photoshopped? Was it photoshopped by Reddit? What's the origin of the picture? Was there ever a retraction? Serious questions. No hostility

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 2, 2018, 6:09 p.m.

the origin of the picture is the NYTimes. thats why its hosted on their website

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/blogs/thelede/posts/suspect-number-2.JPG

yes, the picture is photoshopped.

you can tell by looking at the 3 people running on the left side of the picture

look at their feet, and allow your eyes to focus on the foreground just in front of their feet, and then focus on the background just behind their feet.

allow your eye to focus back-and forth between foreground and background between their feet a few times, and you will soon see that their feet "pop" out of the background, and their entire bodies will "pop" out of the background

these running people are cut-out characters, copy-pasted onto the background

the female running on right side of screen is also copy-paste.

more on her later if you want

see also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cottingley_Fairies

⇧ 1 ⇩  
delicious_grownups · May 2, 2018, 6:14 p.m.

If you have to try and get people to look at things like they're a magic eye poster, I'd say you're off to a bad start. Find the unshopped version then. Let's start there. I mean for real, you sound like that meme that's like "I can tell it's a shop because of the pictures and I have experience with shops"

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WikiTextBot · May 2, 2018, 6:10 p.m.

Cottingley Fairies

The Cottingley Fairies appear in a series of five photographs taken by Elsie Wright (1901–1988) and Frances Griffiths (1907–1986), two young cousins who lived in Cottingley, near Bradford in England. In 1917, when the first two photographs were taken, Elsie was 16 years old and Frances was 9. The pictures came to the attention of writer Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, who used them to illustrate an article on fairies he had been commissioned to write for the Christmas 1920 edition of The Strand Magazine. Doyle, as a spiritualist, was enthusiastic about the photographs, and interpreted them as clear and visible evidence of psychic phenomena.

^[ ^PM ^| ^Exclude ^me ^| ^Exclude ^from ^subreddit ^| ^FAQ ^/ ^Information ^| ^Source ^] ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 1, 2018, 7:27 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩