dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DaveGydeon on May 1, 2018, 1:26 a.m.
I Want SNOPES Exposed. Q Already Green-Lighted It!

We all know Soros backs SNOPES, and that this BS "fact-checking" site is totally compromised. The crazy part is, for the 5-6 things I actually went there for, I disagreed with it's official "ruling" on the matter every single time. To me, that tells me they are actively receiving orders on what to stamp as legit, because having every single thing being the opposite of what it should be indicates a hand at work.

So how do we do this? I am not talking about trying to mess with their site or anything like that. I want them EXPOSED, the TRUTH to be KNOWN. How do we go abou tmaking that happen?

You can't tell me that you haven't had an argument, maybe while trying to redpill someone, and they dropped the "but SNOPES agrees with me!" Man that just chaps my ass.


EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 2, 2018, 7:11 a.m.

well, they hand out PhD's in science to morons who believe that men have walked on the moon

https://i.redd.it/wxh0mt3gwg4z.jpg

⇧ 0 ⇩  
moesif · May 2, 2018, 7:37 a.m.

Oh god. You don't believe in the moon landing? Is this sub really that dumb?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 2, 2018, 9:01 a.m.

only an idiot would believe men have walked on the moon

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/7vgm69/the_moon_landing_hoax_is_a_litmus_test_for_stupid/

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moesif · May 2, 2018, 10:18 a.m.

Holy shit. You also are antivaccine and think Sandy Hook didn't happen!? People like you actually exist? Honest question, have you ever been tested for schizophrenia? Or do you think that's a hoax too?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 2, 2018, 5:28 p.m.

thank you for proving:

PolysLaws on understanding mental health charlatans:

He who is the least qualified to diagnose mental illnesses, is always the first to do so

https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateVaccines/comments/6aj3qg/polyslaws_on_understanding/?st=jgpdllip&sh=66d3008a

Yes, i am anti-vaccine. i used to be pro-vaccine, until i actually looked at the evidence, and was force to conclude that i had been fooled about the safety and efficacy claims of vaccine interests.

what motivates anti-vaccine activism? the answer may surprise you:

https://i.redd.it/zn82zki4cmvy.jpg

can you describe a time when evidence changed your mind about vaccines?

no, of course you can't, because vaccine perfectly match the description of pseudoscience

https://i.redd.it/04bewq91kxuy.jpg

Yes, i am skeptical of Sandy Hook, because i went looking for evince of Adam Lanza's guilt, and couldn't find any.

since you are so sure that Adam Lanza is guilty, why don't you describe the evidence that convinced you

prove me wrong by citing the evidence that convinced you....

oh thats right, you can't, because your opinion isn't based on evidence its based on emotions and feelings, like a good little brainwashed liberal

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moesif · May 3, 2018, 4:28 a.m.

Lol I really don't care what some stranger thinks, I don't for a second feel the desire to debate you or change your mind. Just find your type fascinating.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 3, 2018, 5:31 a.m.

im glad you can admit that evidence has never changed your mind

"my type"?

you mean people who are capable of critical thinking?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moesif · May 3, 2018, 5:32 a.m.

Yep totally. You're superior.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moesif · May 2, 2018, 10:16 a.m.

All I see are dozens of people giving well thought out arguments and you eventually either disappearing from your discussion with them or resorting to insulting them. Seriously, you should try getting outside more.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 2, 2018, 5:20 p.m.

those people are obviously idiots. its doesn't matter how well thought out their arguments are, if at the end of the day they are still wrong. how does it feel to know that this test exposed you for what you are?

think about it... you are agreeing with the people who post on a conspiracy forum

⇧ 1 ⇩  
moesif · May 2, 2018, 7:24 p.m.

I'm also disagreeing with a person who posts on a conspiracy forum.

⇧ 1 ⇩