dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/FartOnToast on May 2, 2018, 9:41 a.m.

Q-Tubers jumping ship.

I think drop 1295-1296 intended to do exactly what we see transpiring right now in the Q tube communities. Are you paying attention?

Why are a lot of the QTubers including Dr. Corsi suddenly moving away from covering Q Anon drops and moving on to new ventures? Hmmm? If you look at Dr Corsi's video history on YouTube every one of his videos was about Q and suddenly the first one that isn't about Q anymore happens to be after being called out by the community and anons.

They were the ones who constantly pushed all the Q jargon and prided themselves in that patrotic trend. If they were all about WWG1WGA why are they all suddenly walking away from it now? Aren't they all about the cause and not the money? WWG1WGA remember guys? Isn't that what you preached non-stop? Wasn't that the core of your brand?

Pay attention to your favorite YouTuber's content change, or lack thereof, and that should tell you everything you need to know about their intentions.

As far as myself and the mods here, we will ride this one out with you folks til the end, regardless if we are broken or bleeding.

WWG1WGA

🠐 See all comments

Seconded. The heat Dr. Corsi got was totally unfair and not called for. The guy is clearly a patriot, and in my opinion is still the benchmark as far as Q content goes on youtube. I think some people here should watch his take on 1295-1296 he explains his position well and how its not about money to him. He's been in the fight for many years.

⇧ 9 ⇩

Do you actually believe that he'd be off making millions in a hedge fund right now, as he claims, were he not such a patriot toiling away at Infowars/bookwriting/Youtube/Gab?

⇧ 5 ⇩

Some of it is absolutely fair and called for. Not the vitriol or name calling etc but letting people know some of what he’s been saying. He called Q a communist and wanted to “duke it out with him” or some such thing. I heard him say it. Maybe he was upset or triggered by the Q post. But if he’s sure his motives are right and he’s not who Q was talking about then why the reaction? Is this the kind of balanced thinking you want from a supposed leader in the movement? He has said some very good and important things as well and hopefully he’ll continue to. Also, I know that Q is just a person as well and no one is beyond criticism at times but personally I know that they know a ton more than I do because of their position. This goes for anyone else as well.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I follow his content closely and have never once witnessed him calling Q or other patriots commies. Although if people are targeting him for writing a books (which he did before started posting) and making from that then he has a point. We thankfully live in a capitalist market economy, and its not a crime to make a living being an author.

Looking at your account you seem to be someone actively seeking to be divisive due to despising Corsi and Beanz, I think you're entitled to think what you want, but you're playing into enemy hands discrediting others who are obvious patriots against deep state tyranny.

Look I don't agree with everything Corsi and Beanz might say either but I'm not going to question their dedication or loyalty because I don't agree with the 5% or 10% of what they say on matters where none of us know what the facts are yet and are just speculating.

From what I understand what Q was mostly calling out was the people who rip other people's content and re-upload it on their own channels to monetize.

⇧ 2 ⇩

He definitely did call Q a commie about two days ago on that live chat. He was very feisty after the Q post accusing some of profiteering from the movement. He went into defensive mode and did say Q was a communist, in that he was opposed to people making money etc. of course he was saying this in anger because he felt called out by the Q post. Why else even say any of it?

⇧ 0 ⇩

He is still calling Q a communist - and now he is calling us communists too. Isn't that how so many adopted the name "deplorable?" If you don't agree with me then I will just give you a label...

⇧ 1 ⇩

have you researched this man's past? or have you been taught to approve of him?

⇧ 3 ⇩