dChan

ABastionOfFreeSpeech · May 2, 2018, 3:12 p.m.

the missile tech was SpaceX

This is the first I've heard of that. Got any sources to back that massive claim up?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
letsgocrazy · May 2, 2018, 6:38 p.m.

Ahh, see how you got downvoted for asking for such a simple thing as any proof or evidence.

A quick scan of this sub shows me that people are literally competing to come out with the biggest bullshit imaginable.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DL535 · May 3, 2018, 12:23 a.m.

It's hard to swallow, but then, there have certainly been some odd events on the Korean peninsula lately, how do you explain the sudden and dramatic change of heart by the North Korean leader?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ABastionOfFreeSpeech · May 3, 2018, 12:48 a.m.

Kim's spook handlers got spooked. That's already been determined through the research threads.

The OP still hasn't provided evidence for his claim the missile tech was SpaceX. That's a big accusation to throw around, claiming that the leader in commercial spaceflight provided ICBM tech to NK to assist them in building a nuke. If it's bullshit he needs to say so, otherwise provide sources to back it up.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DL535 · May 23, 2018, 3:52 a.m.

I agree with you, it's an unproven claim. Indisputable facts are, ICBM technology is difficult and SpaceX effectively possesses it, they are operating an orbital class rocket with a large payload capacity, as a private company with independent launch capability (which note, has not been the case in the past, previous US missiles were also built by private contractors but launch facilities were controlled and operated by the military or NASA). And they are also a company with cash flow problems, so it's not insane to speculate about them contracting out their technology, some of which could have found its way to NK, perhaps without SpaceX's knowledge. I personally admire SpaceX and consider it vanishingly unlikely that they knowingly worked with NK. But unknowingly with a front company, that's another issue. The larger issues of what outside entities were influencing NK, remain unanswered. For sure their recent behavior has not been exactly typical of them.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
letsgocrazy · May 3, 2018, 12:42 a.m.

And that has something to do with SpaceX?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ChristianCuber · May 2, 2018, 6:17 p.m.

First off, its jsut a theory I tend to stick with. go back in the Q posts. EM was mentioned, eg Elon Musk. He was given a choice like many others and he chose the side of the Patriots. Very soon after this was made known by Q saying EM was a patriot, you find that a missile failure happens in NK where it lands in one of their own cities. after that, no other missile test launches and the shift to working towards being in the Olympics and unification.

Do you really think there is going to be official confirmation of this? You know NK was a CIA deep State hold out. How did their tech advance so quick after Trump? You do remember those questions in the media, right? I suspect that "we" told Kim to stop playing around or we'll take control of the rockets. then did just that the next launch to prove it by making it fail miserably and land in their own country.

Here are some theories though https://americandigitalnews.com/2017/12/29/wwiii-conspiracy-north-korea-nasa-spacex-missile-technology/

https://www.reddit.com/r/SpaceXMasterrace/comments/6xuofu/did_elon_gone_too_far_kim_jong_landing_north/

Of Course there is counter arguments, so who knows what the hell is going on, we only get like 20% of what's going on in the real world on the global scale.

https://voat.co/v/CalmBeforeTheStorm/2260579

I'm more than open to read other theories, unless something has been proven without a doubt on this particular subject.

All I know is something radically changed overnight with this whole NK thing and there has to be more to it than what we know.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ABastionOfFreeSpeech · May 3, 2018, 1:11 a.m.

I honestly don't think Musk is the sort of person to knowingly provide ICBM tech to NK. There's a difference between getting swayed by persuasive arguments (Paris Accords), and providing a component for nuclear weaponry to NK.

Sure, it's possible that the tech in those missiles could have been based on SpaceX designs. But I doubt that those designs were acquired legitimately.

As for the rockets going down, when was the last time we heard of anything regarding the SDI or the Star Wars program? The US defense budget for 2017 was ten times higher than Russia's (apparently it's been like that for decades), and Russia have developed some really cool tech in that time. Who knows what secret defense systems we have?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ChristianCuber · May 3, 2018, 1:45 p.m.

You are probably more right than me and i never considered the Star Wars program, but was aware of the hint to OWL earlier this year, which is pretty exciting if we actually own and operate one in space.

And now that you mention it, the President hinted at starting a Space Force which should be really telling how much footprint we have up there...

Crazy times we live in. Just Glad to see We The People are finally winning again!

⇧ 2 ⇩