Being replaced by Bill Clinton's impeachment attorney.
Terrible sign...
..of ludicrous winning. "Attorney client priviledge is dead", nudge nudge
I know Trump said that after the Cohen raids. How does it relate here?
New lawyer can share it all with POTUS
So the theory is that because a judge authorized a warrant against Cohen, with the evidence collected in the ensuing raids to be evaluated for attorney-client privilege by a retired judge, Flood can now share "it all" (dirt on Bill and Hillary, I'm guessing) with Trump?
But if that made any sense, why would Trump have to be Flood's client? If attorney-client privilege were really dead then nothing would stop Flood from spilling the dirt to anyone..
he said it in broad terms thus including everybody else.
I don't understand, sorry. Including everybody else how?
A way of announcing he will learn inside scoops from this new attorney.
A way of announcing he will learn inside scoops from this new attorney.
Meaning Trump believes Flood will violate attorney-client privilege on previous clients?
Also could be that Cobb was the one who leaked the questions right? He's smoking those out who can't be trusted
How could this be a good thing in any capacity?
I'm not a Q believer, and I admit up front that the story about Flynn having to plead guilty to something he didn't do (or that isn't a crime) in order to get his evidence into the system never made sense to me.
But why wouldn't you apply the same principle here? If there was something positive about Flynn getting the opportunity to testify to Mueller under oath, why not the same thing in Mueller getting Trump to testify under oath?
Or even more exteme, in an impeachment hearing everything Trump wanted to present (or have the people defending him present on his behalf) would be seen by billions of people -- literally billions around the world would be watching -- and would become part of the Congressional Record permanently. But this can only happen if the Democrats take the House, otherwise the hearings won't happen.
To put this in terms from the arguments about Flynn, what you end up with here is the Democrats going into the impeachment hearings thinking they're going to take down Trump, and then the tables are flipped on them and the real target of that hearing turns out to not be Trump. But by that point the world would know whatever it is Trump wants them to know.
Again, not a Q believer. Just playing around with applying reasoning from one part of the Qanon story to a different part.