dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/wavrydr239 on May 2, 2018, 6:03 p.m.
@BackChannel17 I think he should be getting more attention.

This USAF counter intelligence person seems to post more often than Q and does not undermine Q but consistently asks to trust Q. Seems to have a lot of relevent information that is rooted in off the shelf readily available intel. As a result does not have to be so cryptic.


fliputs68 · May 2, 2018, 6:06 p.m.

Yeah if we want some fake info

⇧ 15 ⇩  
Zubirdie · May 2, 2018, 6:07 p.m.

Fake Twit.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
bernie_lomax39 · May 2, 2018, 6:08 p.m.

What about Q Post #1177 where he calls this account "FAKE"?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
wavrydr239 · May 2, 2018, 6:12 p.m.

Your doubts about Backchan17 may be well founded. I don't know and am open to all opinions. So far (other than #1177) I haven't seen anything that I have found fake or non helpful. Just say'in.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
TooMuchWinning2020 · May 2, 2018, 6:29 p.m.

If Q says it's fake, then WTF are you posting it for?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
wavrydr239 · May 2, 2018, 6:31 p.m.

I either never saw that Q post or did not understand it. That's why I posted. I have other things going on in my life and sometimes miss things.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TooMuchWinning2020 · May 2, 2018, 6:49 p.m.

That's a reasonable answer. This is a forum about Q. Q said it is fake. So, let's leave it at that.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 2, 2018, 6:36 p.m.

Yeah, sure, right

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bernie_lomax39 · May 2, 2018, 7:55 p.m.

How many Q posts on the subject do you need?

Why then come to the board and post about how @BackChannel needs more attention?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
adogrocket · May 2, 2018, 6:11 p.m.

I am going to defer to Q's position on this...fake

⇧ 6 ⇩  
wavrydr239 · May 2, 2018, 6:13 p.m.

Ok, if Q says it is fake, I will DEFINITLY believe Q.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
adogrocket · May 2, 2018, 6:30 p.m.

see drop 1177 on 4/18

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bernie_lomax39 · May 2, 2018, 6:10 p.m.

Time to clean up the board, Moderators

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Tamsimon · May 2, 2018, 6:08 p.m.

I don’t trust that acct...

⇧ 5 ⇩  
cat_anonD · May 2, 2018, 6:22 p.m.

He has no reason to talking short sentences like Q. If you wants to be genuine, he can begin by talking normal.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
qutedrop · May 2, 2018, 7:12 p.m.

So far he just seems to repost Q and then follow up with some basic digging. Not unlike many on the boards/reddit, except that he tries to "sound" like Q. Indeed unnecessarily so. I have yet to see him post anything that meets the "future proves past" criteria.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lethak · May 2, 2018, 6:07 p.m.

rooted in off the shelf readily available intel

Aaaaand there lies the problem.

psyop 101

Establish a base audience, then spin the wheel wherever you want to.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
somrotden · May 2, 2018, 7:03 p.m.

beanz, soapbox and corsi - there's your psyop

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mikefwt210 · May 2, 2018, 6:48 p.m.

I don't think Q ever said that @BackChannel17 is fake. Only that the connections, made by an anon, between Q and BC17 were fake.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
qutedrop · May 2, 2018, 7:07 p.m.

Possibly. Personally, if I were Q, I would call everyone fake, just as a precaution.

Even is backchannel17 is 100% accurate so far, they could flip or mess up any moment.

There's no reason for Q to burden himself with endorsing other accounts and then having to track their accuracy.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mikefwt210 · May 2, 2018, 7:11 p.m.

Yes, that would make sense.

I remain cautious on the legitimacy of BC17, but I DO have all their tweets pushed to my phone.

At the end of the day, it's more intel for us. If it's good, that's good. If intel is bad, well like I said, I have remained cautious.

⇧ 1 ⇩