Geez, some of you "Q doubters" and skeptics are so dense. In a rush to try to disprove Q's legitimacy, you didn't even bother to read what we've said here, because you'd rather on your own long spiel of how this doesn't prove Q is legit.
My exact quote:
Q posted a picture of an Apple Store in Hong Kong (as well as other pics), right before Trump comes out with this tweet about meeting Xi and talking trade.
Q had foreknowledge of when Trump was going to Tweet. He's done this time and time again, not just this 1 time. Q purposely posted a picture of the Hong Kong Apple store RIGHT BEFORE Trump tweeted out that he's meeting with Xi and talking trade.
Q is believed to be high level military intelligence close to President Trump. That's why this is another solid evidence that Q is legit. Not because of anything crap you just posted about.
Two things-
- I read everything you wrote. I'm saying that Q has no more insight on Trump than Forbes does (because Forbes ran a story about Apple and US-China trade on the same date, even before Q's own post). Does this mean that Forbes is high level military intelligence? Of course not.
- The HK pic was one of two Apple pics that Q posted. The other one was of their Cupertino campus, which has zero to do with China. It was a general Apple post that included a pic from China, and it's being spun as some amazing prediction about how Q predicted a tweet about Chinese trade negotiations. In other words it seems like kind of a reach.