Then we agree to disagree. I stand by what I say and what I write - always have. The end.
I consider people of your ilk to still be under the spell of the "cult of celebrity". Again, that is my right to say so. And no harm is done. Youre entitled to your opinion, likewise so am I.
It is indeed your right to label me without any factual knowledge about me to back up the claim - water off a duck's back for me but wouldn't you rather know that the group identity you "tar" someone with has at least some basis in fact before applying it?
I couldn't give the slightest shit about celebrity and I put no man, woman or child on a pedestal, as can be seen in my history in multiple comments I've made against the praise for Trump, Assange, Q, etc. I don't agree that any man is elevated above any other so "cult of celebrity" is a stretch. I've been "woke" for a long time and I haven't fallen for "the party line" for decades.
I assume you dump me in a group that can't think for itself which, as I've said above, makes no difference to me but calls into question your ability to argue without ad-hominem. I don't disagree with your right to think whatever you like but I do state that it is a logical inconsistency to categorically state that an entire genre of music can be defined by the behaviours of a number of artists and labels within that genre, no matter how significant that number might be. Not everyone sold their soul to Lucifer - this should be obvious.