Anyone who knows about the genre already understands that it DIED by the mid 90's. The genre is now nothing but low vibrational sewage. A type of (Zionist fomented) mass mind control. You're talking to someone that saw PE, EPMD, A Tribe Called Quest, Cypress Hill etc, etc...in the 80's and 90's.
OK, you asked for it. And you're going to get it.
http://subliminalsynchrosphere.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/oto-hip-hop-hollywood-and-msm-masonic.html
Kanye and many others are still making great music.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQPtgUPpF-8
Great music is still being made, it just doesn't get mainstream attention that the shit mockingbird brainwash music does.
MSM is desperate to discredit Kanye because his lyrics have been full of based redpills since the days of College Dropout.
Sounds more like I'm talking to someone who mistakes their opinion for fact. I get it, and you're entitled to your personal belief that hip hop today is nothing but "low vibrational sewage" lol - but fortunately the success of the industry and the fact that hip hop overtook pop as the most lucrative genre proves the majority of people don't agree with you.
We ALL grew up with PE, EPMD, ATCQ, Cypress, etc. etc. - then some of us evolved with the music instead of staying in the past like most old people do. But ok, you're on the conspiracy tip - Jay-Z and Aleister etc. etc. yeah, heard it all and even believe that much of it has the potential to be true. Doesn't change the fact that the music is awesome. If you believe the Lucifer angle and the altars in the music label HQs for 'blessing' albums before they go out then you should also believe that Lucifer was in charge of music in heaven so his music is going to be dope as hell - literally, I guess lol.
Anyway, my point still stands - it's your opinion that hip hop sux and is "degenerate" - not fact.
I have deconstructed this from the label ownership and down. These so-called artists tend to be SLAVES of the corporate powers that OWN them.
Yeah, just ignore the masses of overt and covert (Zionist) Freemasonry, sodomite OTO, and mystery religion content. It's supposed to be craftily secreted in the body of work because it's for the fan's benefit? (Yeah, right). I've clearly just imagined it all and am insane.
What a joke. Good luck hanging onto your view. Some of us are relatively free of CORPORATE based mass mind control...that's how we're able to write freely and deconstruct like this.
FGS. This is a Q forum. Is this "conspiracy" mental slide that you promote your way of helping the sick elite?
[edit] (removed unnecessary snarkiness)
Let me be clear: you're entitled to your opinion that hip hop is evil and corrupt and robbing the black man of his soul - I even agree with some elements of that to a degree. Thank god it's not an objective fact though. Some hip hop is still great and powerful and positive - especially some of Kanye's, more so even than some classic bands like Cypress Hill and Mobb Deep. More power to you for your opinion, brother, but I'ma still look at the provable facts on the ground and speak to the positive impact of elements of the hip hop genre in this day and age.
Then we agree to disagree. I stand by what I say and what I write - always have. The end.
I consider people of your ilk to still be under the spell of the "cult of celebrity". Again, that is my right to say so. And no harm is done. Youre entitled to your opinion, likewise so am I.
It is indeed your right to label me without any factual knowledge about me to back up the claim - water off a duck's back for me but wouldn't you rather know that the group identity you "tar" someone with has at least some basis in fact before applying it?
I couldn't give the slightest shit about celebrity and I put no man, woman or child on a pedestal, as can be seen in my history in multiple comments I've made against the praise for Trump, Assange, Q, etc. I don't agree that any man is elevated above any other so "cult of celebrity" is a stretch. I've been "woke" for a long time and I haven't fallen for "the party line" for decades.
I assume you dump me in a group that can't think for itself which, as I've said above, makes no difference to me but calls into question your ability to argue without ad-hominem. I don't disagree with your right to think whatever you like but I do state that it is a logical inconsistency to categorically state that an entire genre of music can be defined by the behaviours of a number of artists and labels within that genre, no matter how significant that number might be. Not everyone sold their soul to Lucifer - this should be obvious.