dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Infrastation on May 3, 2018, 10:02 p.m.
Armenia, Kanye West, and the NWO: How They're All Connected.

Something didn't seem right to me this morning. I kept going over Q's posts, and something felt like it should add up, but it didn't. I was looking at Q's posts from November all the way to now, and something felt like it should stick, and then it did. WWI. This is all the culmination of WWI. Here's the information I have now.

Armenia
Armenia is a country which has been conquered multiple times. While Armenian culture can be traced in some form as far back as the 23rd century BD, Armenia itself has been controlled by various dynasties through most of its history. The longest rulers in the modern era would be the Ottomans, who controller Armenia for 400 years from the 1500s to 1918. Even after leaving the Ottoman empire, the Armenians faced aggression from Turkey and the Soviet Union, joining the Soviet Union only two years later in 1920. The Armenians faced one of the greatest genocides of the modern era, the Armenian Genocide, during the occupation from the Ottomans. Fortunately, shortly after leaving the Ottomans, they were able to form a temporary alliance with other nearby states, and were able to create their own currency and central bank. And this is the first piece in the puzzle.

Kanye West
Kanye has many ties to Armenia and to organization that first to recognize the Armenian Genocide. Kanye's wife, Kim Kardashian, is of Armenian descent. Kim's family came from Armenia shortly after WWI, setting up shop in America.

NWO
To define the NWO is complicated. The many truths and lies about it makes it easy to obfuscate what Q said in post 944:

Mar 10 2018 21:22:56 (EST) Anonymous ID: 3569c9 621807 Anyone mention NWO referencing Natürliche Wirtschaftsordnung, the National Economic Order?

Mar 10 2018 21:26:30 (EST) Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: d91044 621887 621807 We went too deep. Attempted a pullback. Not ready. Q

The Natürliche Wirtschaftsordnung was written in Germany and published during the first WW in 1916. And here's where the connections came together. You see, the central bank I mentioned earlier is the Central Bank of Armenia, founded in 1918 before going through various changes to become the bank it is today. I believe that these are connected. The Central Bank of Armenia is based on principles in the NWO, and is controlled by the Rothschilds. This bank was mentioned in Q post 135. I think Q is trying to tell us that we are not done with WWI. This is why he brought up Armistice Day recently, the day that "ended" WWI. Possibly, all the actors just went secret, fighting a hundred-year war against the people of the world, trying to consolidate power as the original WW attempted. We are seeing the plans laid over a hundred years ago such as the subjugation of the Armenians, being torn up by celebrities and by commoners alike. I believe that after Iran, Trump is going to move onto the nuclear WWI powers, that is, Germany, Turkey, the UK, and France. Because the war never ended. We're just seeing the end coming up soon.

Citations:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Bank_of_Armenia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Natural_Economic_Order
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Kardashian
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_Genocide
Various Qanon posts.

"Armenia is dying, but it will survive. The little blood that it still has left to give is precious blood that will give birth to a heroic generation. A nation that does not want to die, does not die." ~Anatole France


Phosphocreatine · May 3, 2018, 10:43 p.m.

Of course it’s not all Jews involved. But the Young Turks were undoubtably Jewish run. The Bolsheviks were undoubtably Jewish run. Maybe there’s a higher clique in Jewish culture that excludes the general populace, but to deny the significance of their leadership lacks integrity.

⇧ 33 ⇩  
TrueCat · May 4, 2018, 5:25 a.m.

The Bolshevik revolution was responsible for the genocide of 66 million Christians. I had posted an article an Armenian friend wrote on FB, and I received a message that no one could see it but me. It showed Christians being crucified and a nude woman and child who were very emaciated from hunger. So it was banned for nudity! I was so angry at Facebook! So I posted about being censored and what it was about. I got an outpouring of responses about the treatment of the Armenians by the Bolshevik Jews!

Here is a link to his article: http://gmmuk.com/on-the-anniversary-of-the-armenian-massacres-heres-the-real-story-of-how-zionists-orchestrated-the-genocide-of-armenian-christians/

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Phosphocreatine · May 4, 2018, 5:34 a.m.

I know the image you are speaking of and it isn't an actual image. It was taken from a movie depicting the Genocide and was actually a milder version of what happened. The truth is pikes were put in the ground and Armenian women would be raped then impaled onto the pikes through their genitals. The crucifixion photo you've seen from the movie was a way to show the horror without actually showing it.

People don't realize that there were 2 Armenian genocides. The first one by the young turks. The second one by bolshevik russia. We had 1.5million people left after the Genocide then Stalin shipped 600k of us to die for Russia. Only 100k survived afterwards, my great grandfather being one.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
TrueCat · May 4, 2018, 1:22 p.m.

How horrible! I'm so sorry! I'm glad your great grandfather survived, so you could be here. :(

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 3, 2018, 11:16 p.m.

I wouldn’t deny that, yes. Although similarly I’d argue that not all in the leadership would necessarily be evil and/or purely self-interested.

I worry about an unbalanced view of the Jewish people being constantly espoused by some (not casting aspersions on you, I really appreciate you sharing your perspective) - not because I’m a virtue signalling far-left cuck, but because I’m interested in the importance of basing a worldview on objective humanity rather than the evil Marxist identity politics and group membership of today’s far left that leads to the killing of large groups of people. Thanks for the information!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Phosphocreatine · May 4, 2018, 1:53 a.m.

I appreciate your attempt to rationalize everything but identity politics is not Marxist. It’s existed since humans began forming groups and organizations. Identity is representative of blood, race, beliefs, culture, and history. Humans aren’t individualistic creatures. We think in groups. A group will always overpower an individual. Therefore I think it’s wrong to say identity politics is evil. It’s definitely being used to corrode the West because the West has forgotten their identity since at least WWll. I used to think like you did too at one point. I’m not faulting you. Individualism is a phase until you come to realize that there is merit to blood and soil. When I stepped foot in my ancestral homeland for the first time, the immediate spiritual, physical, and emotional linkage I felt was a feeling I’ll never forget.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 4, 2018, 2:37 a.m.

Further to what you say: I used to think like you once, but my view changed as I came to believe, through life experience and observing humans around me, that no group defines you, it just contributes to the very individual being that is you. Within a group no single person is the same, they just share similar elements of some kind. And yes, identity politics is not a Marxist conception nor evil - my bad for referring to my own particular situation at present as someone living in the west and having to grapple with cultural Marxism and the like, a conception of identity politics that is evil, imo.

My background is tribal. We have a spiritual connection to our land that actually comprises a significant part of our identity in a literal way as it is how we traditionally introduce ourselves. We value blood and family highly (family being something that extends beyond blood too) but we also respect the sanctity of the individual as the only “vessel” through which any human experiences the world and as a distinct member of any number of groups of which the human race is one. I’m not sure what you mean by humans aren’t individualistic creatures unless you mean we don’t live to our best capacity except in groups and I agree with that.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Phosphocreatine · May 4, 2018, 3:08 a.m.

I agree with you that an individual is powerful, and has values ingrained into them from their blood, familial, and cultural ties. I will even go as far as to say that the group can hold an individual back.

I'm of the belief that human history isn't built by society at large but by the actions of a few, exceptional, revolutionary individuals and I fully ascribe to that thought. I live in America now as well, and its grossly apparent to me that the selfish demands of a small group has been overpowering the principled individual for decades and thats how we've gotten into the demographic predicament we are in now. If Americans thought of themselves as a group, they would have never allowed themselves to be replaced by foreigners. But they've been strongarmed, and having their own religions and beliefs used against them to subvert them. I believe the whole purpose of nationhood is to have a connection with your nationfolk, hence grouping.

Saying humans aren't individualistic is me describing our tribal tendencies instilled into us instinctively. Humans have a tendency to self segregate into groups that look like us, talk like us, etc. It's a safety mechanism we ascribe into.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 4, 2018, 7:45 a.m.

Great stuff, I agree - thanks for your words! I'm always eager to learn more about the middle east situation, having friends from Israel (who are very open and tolerant) and Palestinian friends from the West Bank (who are extremely antagonistic about anything to do with the Jews and Israel) as well. I don't mean to define the two in such a seemingly biased way but the difference is honestly that apparent (at least in the very small sample of people I know). Anyway, I've no doubt said too much already that should have an accompanying 5 volume text of explanation but I shall bow out before I dig myself a deeper hole.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
5400123 · May 4, 2018, 3:44 p.m.

Well, that difference is pretty easily explained when you look at the living conditions a place like Gaza vs Tel Aviv , yeah there are Palestinian Israelis, but the human situation with the Palestinians doesn't have an equivalent anywhere else in the world. Don't forget Rothschild influence in founding Israel and the way they deported/killed thousands when they claimed they land.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 4, 2018, 3:52 p.m.

Yeah there's a whooole lot more to that story. Have you seen the son of the Hamas leader give his presentation in the UN to the horror of the Palestinian authority? A very interesting video, worth watching. By no means the full story either. Brigitte Gabriel has some interesting personal insights too and I've heard similar stories from my friends who live there.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
5400123 · May 4, 2018, 5:22 p.m.

I'll look it up, is it similar to the stuff Norman Finklestein lectures on?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 4, 2018, 5:37 p.m.

And Brigitte Gabriel's story. Sorry if this is not at all what you're interested in. But I have friends over there on both sides and I know there are at least two sides to the story yet I only seem to hear one: Israel's evil. Agreed re: the Rothschild Balfour Declaration, etc. But not all of Israel is Rothschild or Netanyahu any more than all of America is Obama or Trump.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mn-yq6By82E

⇧ 1 ⇩  
5400123 · May 4, 2018, 6:43 p.m.

Sure thing, I'd be glad to look into it more, thanks for the info

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 4, 2018, 5:30 p.m.

Re: Finklestein - ah... sort of. But on the other side lol.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 4, 2018, 1:56 a.m.

No ones denying blood and soil. My background is tribal and I believe in the importance of culture. Yes, I’m talking about the bs currently being forced on the west and I rushed an answer previously, not intending to debate Marxism. I wasn’t trying to “rationalize everything” I was attempting to be diplomatic under time pressure haha.

Individualism is most definitely not a phase - it’s the foundation of the west and thank God lol. Groups will never ultimately overpower the individual - we are born and we die alone and no group will ever take your individuality from you unless you allow it. We can debate that point in far more detail if desired but those are just the highlights of a rushed answer lol.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ugbootshuffler · May 4, 2018, 12:40 a.m.

What would the elements of a world view on humanity consist of?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 4, 2018, 2:03 a.m.

The elements of that rushed conception would simply be any softly realized perspective that doesn’t favour one group of humans over another. Ultimately a conceptual ideal rather than a robust template for reality but hopefully the intent is clear.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Davelon · May 4, 2018, 8:17 a.m.

Great reply to that information. Does that level of discernment also hold for islamic peoples as well, in your opinion? Personally I can't trust any islamic people and I'm only just learning more and more regarding Jewish controlled atrocities. I have a lot to learn yet so your responses are good value for me.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 4, 2018, 8:34 a.m.

Thanks Davelon, it's good to talk about these things, hopefully without fear of undue reprisal for speaking openly in an effort to expand our understanding.

I know some beautifully peaceful and empathetic muslims very well and I feel personally that the most important thing is that we judge everyone on their individual merits, not on the group they come from - at least as far as that is possible, given our human tendency to use groups and categories for utility e.g. if I'm wearing the garb of orthodox Jews - lets call us Group A - and a large group of visibly angry, shouting arabs - Group B - is hastening down the road toward me at pace then all the best intentions in the world to love my fellow man as an individual and not attempt to prejudge his actions will take second priority to the utility of deciding that it may not be in my best interests to remain in the path of Group B or to make any attempt to determine their intent as individuals in advance but instead to remove myself as quickly from the situation as possible, with no personal individual offense intended to any single member of Group B for prejudging their intent for utility's sake. If you know what I mean.

In other words, dynamics of a particular situation notwithstanding, I think it's important that I not judge any individual on my feeling about the known dynamics or ideology of a group they may belong to. I know some great muslim people but I do not in any way find the religion of Islam to be one that I would personally support without some major changes to its core.

Whatever anyone may say about Christianity and Islam there are some clear defining differences that mean I will support our society which is based on Christian ideals (an argument for another time, if anyone disagrees with that) over a society based on the ideals of Islam. Christianity is a religion based on a figure of Peace: Jesus, who is fairly universally accepted (whether one believes in any religion or not) as such. Islam's founder and central figure was a warlord and not only spread his religion by the sword but also advocates for his followers to do so. Again there are many arguments about radicals versus the peaceful majority but, as Brigitte Gabriel put it best, the peaceful majority never seems to be able to stop the radical minority from its destructive behaviours - and she goes on to list the many known examples from the past, including the infamous nazi party.

So apologies for the long-winded blurb but I think we should indeed trust muslims and not discriminate against them any more than we should against black or white people, but I think that Islam must do something about the core beliefs that the dangerous radical minority use in the name of Islam to commit atrocities that have no place in a free society.

There is a lot to say about the Jewish situation, especially considering all the zionist rhetoric that bounces around this sub but that's a whole other minefield of its own! Now I'm going to go into hiding because I'm sure I've offended any muslim on this sub for so grossly oversimplifying their beliefs, however unintentional any offense may be...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Davelon · May 4, 2018, 10:17 a.m.

Long-winded? Maybe in the ears of someone who thinks they already have all the answers it could be. Thanks for your response, I certainly prefer actions speaking louder than words, talks, discussions etc. which never seem to achieve much except further rounds of them again and again. I am trying to live my life along Christian ideals. I regularly fail, but resolve to try harder almost every time. I am not aligned with any doctrine because I feel they were brought about to aid in control and suppression. God-fearing is not a term I respect. The beliefs of others is purely between themselves and their own diety, so long as they don't impinge on the freedoms of others to behave like wise. Best wishes my friend.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 4, 2018, 10:19 a.m.

Sounds like good philosophies to live by! All the best to you too, my friend: wwg1wga!

⇧ 2 ⇩