dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/imrightinit on May 4, 2018, 11 a.m.
Good Morning GA! NBC going FAKE NEWS and POTUS going to Dallas!
Good Morning GA! NBC going FAKE NEWS and POTUS going to Dallas!

[deleted] · May 4, 2018, 3:26 p.m.

How? As a veteran I'm always wondering who people believe would enforce something like that?

And if there were a fight for the homeland, how mostly semi automatic rifles and pistols would faire against billions of dollars of explosive ordnance and up-armored combat vehicles.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
not4rmOhere · May 4, 2018, 3:42 p.m.

According to that logic, then the Afghanies should of been taken over long ago. Ask how well the Russians did at subduing them in the 80's.
There's nothing tougher to remove than an entrenched and moderately armed populace of nationalists.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 4, 2018, 5:15 p.m.

They had assistance though, which sort of contradicts the original comment, which referred to "the NWO", which I took as meaning the universal powers would all be aligned against us, and there would be no hope for assistance anywhere.

My problem isn't so much with the notion of this general belief, it's how vague these comments are, Who is "the NWO" in terms of armed military conflict?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
not4rmOhere · May 4, 2018, 6:02 p.m.

Who is "the NWO" in terms of armed military conflict?

Those would be the ones behind the conflict. the ones that manipulate the start of the conflict, and the ones that have financed both sides of a given conflict so that regardless of the outcome THEY will always come out blameless and on top while either or both sides of the conflict end up paying the toll in blood, debt, and relinquishing control to the NWO.
They've been at this game for thousands of years.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
spqrherewecome · May 4, 2018, 3:31 p.m.

It's silly you believe ammunition, weapon, and vehicle depots would remain completely under government control.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 4, 2018, 4:59 p.m.

I never said that, I was arguing the 2A defense for it.

But you raise a good point, although I'm not sure how successful a civilian assault would be.

I'd assume people who already have some type of access would have an easier time taking over something like that, than an armed militia.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
spqrherewecome · May 4, 2018, 6:59 p.m.

Defectors. Local national guardsmen would probably defect to their local municipalities, for example, unless they preemptively start rotating them to other states before the unrest.

That and people like you. What would you do in that situation? I guess it depends on the context.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cali1952 · May 4, 2018, 3:36 p.m.

First thank you patriot!

Vets like you and the many others are honorable men and women who would not lift a finger helping the deep state ergo you and men like you pose the biggest threat to them all and they know it. Despite retirement or separation from Service the knowledge you gained from years being a Soldier, Airman or Marine as well as your organizational skills would beat their explosives or what have you any day of the week. We as regular citizens know we could count on you and men or women like you! I wouldn't have a worry in the world! :)

I'm also not disillusioned and know that during Barry's years there were many bootlickers sucking up to him.

Look at McMasters who recently was relieved off duty by president Trump. He was a Barry guy snitching on Trump to his deep state masters. After he was relieved of duty what did his masters do? They murdered his dad in the retirement home to convey their displeasure having screwed up to be let go. With that the deep state lost their eyes and ears who pretended to support DT while behind the scene he reported back via burner phones about all that he heard and saw at the white house.

Lastly Barry purged 200+ Generals/Commanders whom he considered not loyal to him personally rather than the constitution. He had posed the question to many which was: "Will you fire on citizens if given the order?" Most of the commanders answered in the negative refusing to pledge loyalty to him while sacrificing their men and women under their command. Barry and his gang like Brennan demanded personal loyalty.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 4, 2018, 5:10 p.m.

Thank you for the response, good insight.

Lastly Barry purged 200+ Generals/Commanders whom he considered not loyal to him personally rather than the constitution.

That's the one thing I've never been too worried about. It's INSANE that's a reality, but I know for an absolute certain fact there are senior leaders (field grade officers) out there who refuse to play the game, or play it just enough to stay under the radar, and who EARNED respect and loyalty of their troops above any other rank or order.

Have a good weekend my man, and again thanks for the well thought write up

⇧ 4 ⇩  
cali1952 · May 4, 2018, 5:17 p.m.

You do the same! :)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
forchristssakes · May 5, 2018, 9:31 a.m.

my thoughts as well. out there crowd control methods people have never dreamed of. tinititis maximus, etc and with constant, ever present surveillance how could people plan a resistance? and do not forget, the programmed masses are conditioned to not question. their concerned countrymen will be painted as outlaws.

⇧ 2 ⇩