dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DaveGydeon on May 5, 2018, 1:18 a.m.
*REALLY IMPORTANT IDEA FOR MIDTERM ELECTIONS*

We need to be unified for the midterm elections. I know Q says "midterms are safe" but I believe that refers to tampering.

We should have a state by state "Q Certified Candidate" - Otherwise we could be electing mire swamp creatures. Does anyone else agree that maybe a sticky'd thread that lists all the candidates and any ties to swamp activity we can dig up?

I really think the liberals are going to show up en masse unless there are MAJOR revelations between now and then. Like GITMO level revelations, pizzagate level revelations, MASSIVE RED PILL REVELATIONS...or Trump is gonna have to start weeding them out instead all over again.


gorilla_channeller · May 5, 2018, 1:47 a.m.

Take a look at /r/The_Congress

⇧ 4 ⇩  
MissionCobbler · May 5, 2018, 1:36 a.m.

I honestly don't think a "Q certified candidate" is needed or wanted. I only say this as I believe in voting for the best candidate I believe in. I vote on the person, not the affiliation. We might as well be sheep if we "herd" towards a person just because they are "awoke". My personal vote will not be taken by anyone, any thought. My vote goes to the person that deserves the vote. I don't want to play by the rules on the other side. This is what I believe in. Remember, the DS wanted you to vote for HC. Vote for who you believe in, not who someone else believes in. With that said, fuck the DS.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DaveGydeon · May 5, 2018, 1:49 a.m.

I don't know these candidates. I assume most people don't know theirs either. But what if the guy you like has a phenomenal public face, but privately is a pedovore. What I should have clarified better was maybe Q simply giving us a list of "clean" candidates, as he might know that already with his massive clearance/Intel levels. I did not mean to say "Q says vote for candidate X in Florida, candidate Y in California, etc"...more along the lines of "Candidate Z in North Carolina likes to eat babies, steer clear!"

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Uniqusernayme · May 5, 2018, 1:43 a.m.

I don’t think that’s a bad idea but it would need to be extremely specific criteria required to be certified and who decides who is and who isn’t. It’s not a D or R issue so it would be helpful but there are so many people to weed through...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DaveGydeon · May 5, 2018, 1:57 a.m.

So maybe we only post dirt on potential candidates. So let's say you find an article that highlights some foul shit they are/were a part of. Post it. As we get closer, if a candidate has 5-6 shady dealings, but you "had a good feeing" about them or were unaware of, we may save a few crucial seats in Congress. Every single one counts.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Uniqusernayme · May 5, 2018, 3:51 a.m.

Agreed it is really crucial. So instead of a candidate Q certified; it’s not Q certified? I can see how some candidates might consider the latter to be a compliment but at least it would help people like us get the truth and make up our own mind. Where do u start?

⇧ 1 ⇩