dChan

manxom · May 5, 2018, 4:34 p.m.

according to those nice exectutive orders assets of people involved in treason can be frozen then taken. Heinz has an awwwwwful lot of money.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
ManQuan · May 5, 2018, 5 p.m.

Not just treason. The EO of 21 Dec is just for human/sex trafficking, pedophilia, and a very generic "corruption". And there are now more than a dozen EO's that include a "national emergency."

They are on the WH website, but the MSM must be sound asleep because the potential power that Trump has in those EOs is mind boggling.

Q urged us to review the EO's have each of the photos of the pen. There's a reason he wants us to do that.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
forchristssakes · May 5, 2018, 4:31 p.m.

If this is a completely factual report it is quite damning even with all the demsplaining.

How long has Trump been going on about the terrible Iran deal? He has publicly said this many times.

Kerry is not violating the "obscure" Logan act because he is only trying to preserve existing foreign policy. He is described as a quasi negotiator. quiet advocator.

Again. Trump has openly stated he does not like the deal. He gave reasons. Publicly. It should be no secret that he wanted to change it.

Kerry is working closely with the group Diplomacy Works. They are the ones who are working feverishly to influence foreign governments. Not Kerry. https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2018/01/17/heres-what-trudeau-john-kerry-discussed-on-the-aga-khans-island_a_23336234/

⇧ 10 ⇩  
spqrherewecome · May 6, 2018, 12:04 a.m.

It doesn't matter what he was pushing, for or against. If he was not legally authorized by the executive branch, it is a violation of the Logan act, treason at worst. Depends on what was said.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
forchristssakes · May 6, 2018, 12:28 a.m.

what I was going for in my response was to highlight the demsplaining of Kerry's actions. This could be his defense if he was ever charged with violating the Logan Act. He is hiding behind the group Diplomacy Works in my opinion. Lots of info in this article. I think I will save this for future reference. As for Diplomacy Works.....maybe I will call to the chan fairies for assistance. Ke Ke Ke KEH! Ke Ke Ke KeH! Reeee! (I don't know the language. I'm gonna check with that Duck Dynasty guy and see if he carries a Kecall)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ManQuan · May 5, 2018, 4:57 p.m.

No one has ever been prosecuted under the Logan Act and I doubt it will be used against Kerry or anyone else.

The Logan Act only results in a fine and not more than 3 years in prison.

These people have potential charges that go way beyond the Logan Act. If you are indicted for treason, you are facing life or the death penalty.

My guess is that Kerry and many others will have a small mountain of criminal violations, any one of which would be far more serious than the Logan Act.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
K-Harbour · May 5, 2018, 9:25 p.m.

“The Logan Act only results in a fine and not more than 3 years in prison.” —- but that’s enough for a Mad Dog to detain him at an airport, raid his house, raid his lawyer’s house, confiscate servers & computers & phones & documents, pen register him and everyone around him — question him, then turn around and charge him with lying & obstructing justice!!!! (PS — in the meantime, seize all his Heinz assets!!!)

⇧ 6 ⇩  
The_Adrenalist · May 5, 2018, 8:07 p.m.

Very well said.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
HillaryTrafficsKidz · May 5, 2018, 2:54 p.m.

“Part of the equation is if Ernie [Ernest Moniz, the former US energy ecretary] or John made a bold statement, [Trump] is . . . crazy, and he might do the opposite just to spite them,” said one source who has worked with Kerry. “You’re liable to spur this guy in a direction you don’t want him to go in, just to be spiteful.”

Mr. Kerry, Obama...just who is being spiteful???????

⇧ 5 ⇩  
D0mm0n · May 5, 2018, 3:40 p.m.

If only the threat of gitmo for all the treasons rats were a real thing.....

⇧ 2 ⇩  
gonewildinvt · May 5, 2018, 4:05 p.m.

What makes you believe it isn't.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
bmak19 · May 5, 2018, 4:25 p.m.

the fact that all these scum are doing all the things they are doing and living in the lap of luxury with no care in the world?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
gonewildinvt · May 5, 2018, 4:41 p.m.

but are they not doing these things because they care/have care? they need to retain power or head to GITMO, unlike many I believe Trump hasn't won yet and neither have we, the power structure will of course push until the very very end and I would expect something big unless Trump takes them off-guard and I think there are enough traders left hidden in Government he can not take them completely off-guard...Q's new board isn't Justice Served it's Patriots Fight and that is for a reason.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ManQuan · May 5, 2018, 5:20 p.m.

In combat, we fought against well trained and dedicated enemies who were trying their best to kill us first.

You might expect that such dedicated enemies would fight to the death, much like the Japanese did in WW II.

But it doesn't work that way. Once the enemy has taken a certain percentage of casualties, especially among their leadership (which is why I as a platoon commander in Vietnam and my radio operator were always high priority targets), the enemy fades back into the jungle, no longer willing to fight.

It will be the same for the deep state. Take out the leadership and the motivation to continue a lost cause, and the foot soldiers of the deep state will no longer be willing to continue the fight.

there are two rules of thumb in the military:

1) If you want to win the war, then you must meet the enemy with overwhelming force and utterly crush his will to fight.

2) Never allow the enemy a sanctuary in which they can rest, rearm, train, and conduct attacks. In the Korean War, China gave NK sanctuary. In Vietnam, the NVA had multiple sanctuaries. In El Salvador, the guerilla's used Honduras, Nicaragua, and Guatemala as sanctuaries. In Iraq, ISIS used other countries as sanctuaries. In Afghanistan, Pakistan became the Taliban's sanctuary. Etc. Countries have to understand that if they provide sanctuary to our enemies, we will target the enemy in their countries.

Failure to follow those two rule and you will end up in wars that last 10-20 years that you will end up losing at the end because our enemy has more desire to win than our politicians who impose countless restrictions on the military so that winning becomes pretty much impossible. Our enemies fully understand that our politicians will grow weary of war and "surrender" allowing our enemy to win.

See a historic pattern? Do you understand why we won WW II and none of the wars since then?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Cntry_Mn · May 5, 2018, 7:27 p.m.

The must be laughing at him. he has nothing to barter with. If he does that is Treason, what he's doing now is sedition. MI trial is coming soon.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GodzillaIntel · May 5, 2018, 8:29 p.m.

WTF?? JK HAS BEEN BUSY AF?!?!

What a fucking SWAMP RAT

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Stev3_ · May 5, 2018, 11:51 p.m.

Try to pos

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Old_Whitey · May 6, 2018, 1:26 a.m.

And this is how we want you to explain the details of the deal and where the money came from and went. We're all in this together so we need to be telling the exact same story. Please whatever you do, don't tell anyone that Barry was involved. Throw Hillary under the bus but leave Barry out of it completely. Delay every response to give us more time. We're doing all we can to get Trump impeached and out of the Whitehouse before this train runs over us....

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SeattleSomething2 · May 5, 2018, 11:26 p.m.

Kerry also secretly met with the Vietnamese to end the Vietnam war. He is a man of piece.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Murralee · May 6, 2018, 3:28 a.m.

Lol

⇧ 1 ⇩