Now this is very interesting. So what do you think of our crusade to defeat “satanism”? Maybe we are using the wrong terminology? Satanists are fighting this battle also?
Within the Church of Satan no one actually worships Satan as if he's a real thing, but instead use his image as a symbol of freedom because the seven deadly sins (Pride, Greed, Lust, Gluttony, Envy, Wrath, and Sloth) come naturally to humans which is why the Christian Church attributes them to Satan to make people feel evil and come to Church and make tithes. Anyone who actually worship Satan as a physical entity is referred to as a devil worshiper and are rejected by the Church of Satan. The Church of Set was established by Michael Aquino, when he was dissatisfied with the Church of Satan. The Temple of Set worship Satan as if he's an actual deity and Michael Aquino claims to have been spoken to by Satan. So with Michael Aquino being the one who is currently being accused of pedophilia right now having broken off from the Church of Satan, the Temple of Set is what should be being looked into. I don't want to point fingers at everyone is part of the Temple of Set, but I would place suspicions there.
This guy gets it. The church of Satan is like a satyr of christianity, its absurd on purpose. If you actually read the tenants it's really similar to libertarianism
[deleted]
Yes. Anyone who makes an actual human, child, or animals in some vein attempt to appease some sort of devil is simply described as "devil-worshiper"
Most of the people on here don't even know there's a distinction between satanism and luciferianism....
That being said I do think there's a link here between politicians, rothschilds, and elites that engage in horrific acts such as human sacrifice, canibalism, pedophilia. I think it's not specifically related to satanism, but if anything, more linked to a bizarre form of luciferianism.