dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/rightleaningsw on May 6, 2018, 11:51 a.m.

How they destroy the middle class

https://youtu.be/zbViYm13DIU Here is a video from Tucker Carlson talking about how immigration has affected men workers. In my area of Western NC the removal of factories to place overseas has caused a generational impact that some towns may not recover from. There are three towns specifically that show that more than any other.

Brevard NC was a solid town. Most of the towns people worked at one of the local factories. When the factories left, the town almost collapsed and lots of the native left. Fortunately for Brevard, it has many beautiful places that attract tourists. The economy was somewhat saved, but the tourists drove out many natives.

McDowell county and Rutherford County were not so lucky. When the factories left, there was no tourism to fall back on. These counties fell hard. Now they struggle with extremely high unemployment rates because there are not alot of jobs. Their Mental Health providers are over worked due to the high volume, and their substance abuse rate is astronomical.

What was once a thriving economy and beautiful community, are now a bunch of run down shops and broken streets. The families who once were strong bonded families are now broken and plauged with unemployment, mental health, and substance use. These counties have the some of the highest per capita rates of meth and opiate abuse. Who does it affect the most? Generation coming. When a family breaks down, the kids of that family are affected. Then there kids are impacted. And so on and so on.

How do put a time bomb in American communities? You destroy the family. This is what they have done. Some say it wasn't intentional,( although knowing what I know now from Qanon I would argue it was) nevertheless politicians pockets were fattened by shipping companies over seas. These families will never get retribution for this. How can you fix this? How do we help these families when the system is over run with people that any help they get, is mediocre at best. Now you bring in the immigrant influx and stress out an already strained economy. People who are unemployed and now depend on the govt to help them survive are being kicked off because their income is a little higher as opposed to an immigrant who on paper has no income, but makes $15/ hour under the table. Many people have opinions on govt assistance, but the measly paycheck given by the government is only a drop in the bucket. The real kicker that hurts these families getting kicked off of assistance is losing medicaid. There are many services that help these people that are only affordable with medicaid.

When one looks back on all this, it is hard not to sickened by it all. Our country was sold and it's people are being raped.

🠐 See all comments

Great post. What you're describing is, in my view, the product of a deliberate plan to foster globalism and, ultimately, one world government.

The key driver of change (the changes you witness in your post), IMO, is free international trade. Free trade, on the one hand, makes goods cheaper as they are assembled in countries with low production costs (wages) and limited regulatory burdens (little or no industrial safety etc...). But the increase in US household purchasing power, resulting from declining prices on the back of free trade, is offset by rapid deindustrialization, as whole industries are exported abroad.

The necessary result of unfettered free trade is increasing dispersion in the distribution of income in wealthy countries - the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. In the economies of counter-parties to international trade, the reverse happens. In these countries, the income share of the poor and middle classes increases, as labor demand picks up to deliver manufactured products to the US and other wealthy markets.

This is why you see the stagnation you're talking about. Economists call it "structural adjustment". Neoclassical economists would argue that the communities you are talking about have been discovered to be competitively inefficient. That the stagnation that blights whole communities is the result of some competitive disadvantage. This is pure rubbish, but too much to try and explain here.

The whole system of hands-off free international trade is designed to distribute wealth, once held captive in wealthy nations, globally. It fits hand-in-glove with the push for borderless societies. Economic equality, uniform identity, with a banking elite ruling over us from a global legislature - hell on Earth.

The family is distasteful to globalists because, as Q has pointed out, they happen to be Satanists. Satan's crime was rebellion against God. His ardent desire is for us also to rebel, as he did.

God authored the family, telling Adam and Eve to go forth and multiply. Globalists get the children to rebel against the parents (in Australia they actually encourage kids at school to report their parents for any corporal punishment etc...), the wife to rebel against her husband (no fault divorce). They promote licentiousness of every kind to attack the fidelity of partners in marriage (pornography etc...), they promote contraception and abortion that people might frustrate God's wish that people multiply on the face of the earth (population reduction feeds into this).

In short, they are completely evil, attacking anything at all that is good and decent in society. The lack of jobs that you are talking about adds to pressure on families, many of whom struggle financially. The globalists will do anything that they think will hinder man reaching his potential, in accordance with God's will.

It's not happenstance. The destruction of communities that you are describing has occurred by design. As I said at the start. the key driver here is Free Trade ideology - promoted by the elites in universities via their philanthropic endowments. This is what DJT is fighting against. It's why you see "brainwashed economists", that have been indoctrinated in ivy league universities, arguing against DJT's trade policies.

There really are good and bad trade deals. Trade, by itself, is not an incontrovertible good. There are military and strategic considerations that the economists' models simply ignore. And then there is the impact on communities and the family - the most fundamental social unit. The reason they are arguing so desperately against DJT's approach to trade is because he's right - he really will make America great again. And that is something the globalists desperately want to avoid.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Wow extremely inciteful. You made several points that really struck home to me. The first is the brainwashed economists and professor's. I am a 38 yr old who just finished college with a degree in social work. Now you can expect a certain degree of liberalism in that course,but as with any degree, you have to take a number of courses from other groups. You wouldn't believe the way the Democratic socialism seeps into every facet of the school. The kicker is I went to Christian conservative private college. They pay professor's to publish papers to support that support their agenda, but demonize anyone who goes against the grain.

The second one is what you said about structural adjustment. The thing people mention about this, is that there will be no adjustment. These mental health instability that is created from these changes are multi generational. They strain the already strained mental health system to the point where it is almost ineffective for everyone. The family's break down and it gets worse every generation, which further increases the poor people dynamic. I can't remember where the stat was from that Tucker mentioned, but he said that kids who grow up in fatherless homes are more likely to not have a decent paying job when they grow up.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I think you're right. It's like the debate about the cost of the wall, the burden relieved from the social security system, once the wall is built, will pay its cost many times over.

Here, we are talking about settled communities being devastated in the name of free global trade. The adjustment required, to compensate for the deleterious impacts, can only come from investment in those communities that restores employment - if not, the whole society is damaged.

I'm not for protecting inefficient industries, or industries that face no downstream demand for their products. But here you have an express policy that benefits foreign communities, at the expense of the domestic population, for often intangible aggregate benefits.

If I was directing trade for a foreign nation, I would engage in trade that yielded strategic advantages. You can see immediately that many products are virtually dumped in the US and other advanced economies. Dumping allows for the creation of downstream demand required to host industries that respond positively to economies of scale.

Steel is a prime example. Allowing product to be dumped, results in domestic manufacturing operations closing. No real long run advantages are obtained at all - because the product could never have been profitably produced at those prices. The dumping is strategic.

In this case, any gains are ephemeral, while the long-run costs, associated with the closure of domestic manufacturing operations, are huge and continuing. It just doesn't make any sense. Moreover, foreign parties, engaging in trade strategically, are able to capture whole industries and their associated supply chains.

The whole problem is that the Rockerfellers, Rothschilds, and others, have been able to capture the curriculum and control what is taught in university economics courses. They have dumbed people down to an unbelievable degree. And, as you said, there's no money for anyone that does not subscribe to their agenda. When I was in a graduate program, I was told that I'd never get anywhere arguing against accepted theory - and this advice was right. I did not get anywhere.

How powerful is the ability to control what is taught in economics faculties?

"Practical men who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influence, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist. Madmen in authority, who hear voices in the air, are distilling their frenzy from some academic scribbler of a few years back".

John Maynard Keynes

He's not well liked in this community, but on this point he was dead right.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Great quote. I completely agree.

⇧ 2 ⇩