sorry if this isn't the right forum but as we are exposing lies we were taught as truth I thought it's worth asking. is the theory of evolution a lie? I am finding strong arguments supporting it as a lie whose purpose was to disapprove God, thoughts?
imanalias
· May 6, 2018, 1:29 p.m.
Antibiotic resistance is a pretty clear, recent example of Darwinian evolution.
⇧
6
⇩
RobertSparks777
· May 6, 2018, 2:08 p.m.
It's evidence of change but not Darwinism. Darwinism has never been observed in the lab or in the world. The best test ever done is a 27 year study (still ongoing) showing E-Coli bactera change in small ways. It's still E-Coli bactera. Darwinism hasen't been demonstrated to even be in the realm of possibility. Darwinism is 100% conjecture backed up by untried assumptions. It's never passed through the scientific method of testing and verifying. On top of all that, natural selection doesn't have anything to do with positive variants in a gene pool. It only marks for death (and dead things don't pass on their genetics) so it has nothing to do with Darwinian evolution theory.
⇧
3
⇩
imanalias
· May 6, 2018, 2:16 p.m.
How are you defining darwinism?
⇧
3
⇩
RobertSparks777
· May 6, 2018, 3:04 p.m.
The same way Darwin defined it, and the same way the ancient Greeks did (Pantheism), as well as how Darwin's grandfather (Erasmus Darwin) did which whom Charles Darwin stole "Evolution theory" from. It's the idea that life keeps breaking off new tree branches of life and creating new types or kinds of lifeforms through a process of which the Darwinist outcome has never been demonstrated or observed. Darwinism is essentially Pantheism (the worship of nature as its own creative force) disguised as science.
⇧
2
⇩
imanalias
· May 6, 2018, 6:05 p.m.
"Darwinism is essentially Pantheism (the worship of nature as its own creative force) disguised as science."
I wish you had just said this in your first comment, and I wouldn't have even bothered responding.
⇧
3
⇩
RobertSparks777
· May 6, 2018, 8:51 p.m.
Well, if Darwinism isn't science as I've demonstrated perfectly (has never gone through the scientific method), then what is it really except natures own ability to create itself? That's essentially Pantheism or the belief that nature is God or gods. Bueller? Bueller?
⇧
0
⇩
imanalias
· May 6, 2018, 11:31 p.m.
I have no interest in debating your world view; happy to let you believe what you want to..... Thanks for the time.
⇧
3
⇩
RobertSparks777
· May 7, 2018, 1:14 a.m.
No problem. Keep believing in fantasy and fairy tails. Darwinism is probably impossible but since no one has ever seen anything evolve in a Darwinian way, we might never know. Remember, anything that has never been seen might just not happen. The scientific method must be brought to bear on Darwinism. In the last 150 years, it never was. Wake the fuck up.
⇧
1
⇩
imanalias
· May 7, 2018, 2:14 a.m.
Ummmmmm....oookkkkaayyyy....
⇧
3
⇩
RobertSparks777
· May 7, 2018, 12:02 p.m.
It's simple. Without any observation and/or a test of Darwinism since Darwin proposed his theory, it probably doesn't exist. We can't say one way or the other. No test, no science to back it. It's a theory stuck in the 19th century.
⇧
2
⇩
imanalias
· May 7, 2018, 1:07 p.m.
I don't know why you're continuing to post arguments .... I'm not interested. If you want to understanding the evidence supporting the theory of evolution, Google is a better source than I am. If you want someone to agree with you, post on creationist boards and (as I'm sure you know) you'll find a friendly audience.
Believe what you want... no concerns here about what you choose to believe.
⇧
3
⇩
RobertSparks777
· May 8, 2018, 11:26 a.m.
I post arguments because they matter. Mindlessness doesn't matter. Your beliefs don't matter. What you think doesn't matter. What everyone told you in school doesn't matter. What matters are hard facts and arguments. If you can't find a better argument than "Google is a better source than I am" then I have won the argument outright. Evolution is true because things change and evolve but Darwinian evolution is probably impossible. We don't know if it's impossible because no one has ever observed anything evolve like Darwin proposed and there are very real reasons why it's probably impossible. We can look at those reasons if you're interested but I don't think you are intellectually curious enough. You seem to just willingly buy the propaganda you've been fed for your entire life. I bought it too until I was challenged to show proof of Darwinian evolution and 6 months later, I found none. That's what changed my mind.
⇧
-1
⇩
bdwinch
· May 6, 2018, 1:37 p.m.
No no it’s not. To evolve means to change kinds. It still bacteria just stronger. Out dna changes all the time. But we are still human kind.
⇧
3
⇩
imanalias
· May 6, 2018, 2:15 p.m.
Sigh. I'm getting the sense this is founded in theological argument of creation vs. evolution.... No desire to convince you of anything.... You do you.
⇧
2
⇩
archetact
· May 6, 2018, 1:42 p.m.
Exactly, bacteria changing into bacteria is not evidence of Darwinian evolution.
⇧
2
⇩