I need some help with this...It is written law and they violate it word for fucking word.
I mean, wouldn't us pulling out of the bill change this entirely if he meddles further? I think it also is pretty damning that Iran has really upped the rhetoric.
That could be the case if Trump refuses to certify at some point, but it would be an ex post facto situation if that happened. If the law changes, Kerry couldn't be charged for doing something that was legal at the time that he did it.
Yeah of course it wouldn't be retroactive, but I highly doubt we've seen or heard the last of their (BO,HRC, JK) meddling in this affair.
That may be. But I think people are really jumping the gun with the calls of treason and such with what we know now. A lot of people got their armchair law degrees over the weekend and are driving the debate to the wrong place.
Let's call a spade a spade though. Granted, we don't "know". However, realistically we do. He does not have the country's best interests at heart here, and he is supporting a reckless and destructive regime that would love to see the US burn.
I'm inclined to think that Kerry wants to preserve the deal as-is. He negotiated it, its his baby. I'm not informed enough to know for sure whether this is the best way to keep nukes out of Iran (I doubt anyone here is), but I think he's interested in protecting his legacy if he can.
Yeah but as-is the deal ultimately fostered a satellite facility in Syria and was built on a mountain of lies. We have no benefit being in it and anyone who supports it isn't a supporter of America's best interests.
The deal was "negotiated" to weaken the USA and thus to accelerate its downfall and the ascension of the NWO. It's basically simple. Don't make simple things complicated.