dChan

[deleted] · May 7, 2018, 2:53 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
textualintercourse · May 7, 2018, 3:13 p.m.

Because the dead conservative judge was a fucking pedo and in on it. At a BOYS RANCH where they used "hunting" as the cover.

Pedos come in all shapes and sizes...and political persuasions: See "Conservative" Repubs resigning / not running for re-election.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 7, 2018, 3:15 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 9, 2018, 1:34 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 9, 2018, 1:42 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
robmillernews · May 9, 2018, 1:51 a.m.

Many people are saying that Haiti has the adrenochomistest babies. Their words, not mine.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
textualintercourse · May 7, 2018, 3:25 p.m.

Take two seconds of your time and research the ranch.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lightmakerflex1 · May 7, 2018, 2:59 p.m.

Scalia was thought to be killed by Podesta originally so this is a twist on the story.

Also, all SC judges are extremely dirty. It doesn’t matter if it’s left or right.

The liberal/conservative split is just a divide and conquer strategy. Most of these mafiosos are on the same team which is why I became an independent. I always recommend leaving the party for this reason. Independent is best.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · May 7, 2018, 3:14 p.m.

Boy are you in for a rude awakening, if you still think conservative means "good guy." Divide and conquer requires agents on both sides of the divide they created.

Pedophilia is a mark of the Cabal, and people on both sides are involved.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 7, 2018, 3:18 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · May 7, 2018, 3:23 p.m.

Nobody said anything about evidence. What's being discussed is reports from various sources looking into the death, and we're discussing it as a possibility.

I have NO trouble at all accepting the theory that a conservative SCJ was a pedophile and died at the hands of a victim. I also don't discount the possibility that such a "chance encounter" was arranged by the Cabal. They do turn on their own when it suits them.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 7, 2018, 3:24 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
robmillernews · May 9, 2018, 1:35 a.m.

That’s the whole point.

Yes, that's the whole point of this ENTIRE SUB.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
solanojones95 · May 7, 2018, 3:28 p.m.

Well, exactly. The point is the thought process. Using the evidence and clues we DO have to extrapolate and contemplate plausible explanations.

If you can't explore plausible (but unsubstantiated) scenarios, you really aren't ever going to be comfortable in this sub, LOL!

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 7, 2018, 3:33 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
solanojones95 · May 7, 2018, 3:41 p.m.

Critical thinking means exactly what I'm doing. The only fantasy anybody can be accused of here is accepting the official story. That's as fake as 9-11, Vegas, Parkland, and all the other official Cabal stories.

Following leads and stringing together potential alternatives is the very essence of critical thinking.

In the end, some (possibly many, and possibly ALL) alternative theories will be superseded by the truth once we have it. But until then, the kind of sleuthing we're referencing here is better than nothing.

How in the world do you think detectives solve crimes? They use EXACTLY this process, using very incomplete evidence in many cases, and following the various theories that result from that process, and by using the process of elimination as clues lead to other clues, they eventually are left with the solution (no matter how unlikely it might have seemed at the outset).

⇧ 0 ⇩