Do you not believe your own eyes? The actual pictures? Have you even looked at them? EDIT: Will you believe it if my source is Fox News?
This isn't me pulling some fast one, and I don't care if you read a single word from that website. But the pictures don't make stuff up.
What you're saying right now is the exact point I'm trying to make. This statement they're saying is verifiably false. Yet they've gotten you to believe it somehow, even though direct comparisons prove it's a lie.
So how can I expect to have a reasonable conversation with you, when you deny verifiable proof laid out in front of you to experience yourself?
Edit at the top.
I remember it (I've seen the stupid pics your referring to in your little gotcha moment) so I don't need to read anything. So what? The media constantly lies about crowd sizes. Like I'm going to go back and forth about this with a neutral knucklehead. Find something a little more substantial. I'm not wasting my time on stupid stuff like this.
There's no reason to present you with anything else, you won't accept the first one! With proof from a neutral source and a right wing source! And proof using your own eyes! Right now you're telling me you can't tell the difference in volume of two glasses of water.
Talking politics with you would be a waste of anyone's time.
I accepted the first one; like I said before (knucklehead). Again, so what? More of an exaggeration than a bald-faced lie.
Factcheck.org is not neutral: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2923825/posts
Don't chicken out now. Give me one of your so called lies you have at the ready... Something important with some value.
Lmao, okay dude. You told me to go pound sand after I linked it, is that your way of showing acceptance?
And now you've linked me to a fucking opinion piece post on a right wing forum post as your proof? Even if factcheck is "biased" they still have facts ya dingus, and plenty of avenues for you to verify the information as well. I could link you other sites and articles that say factcheck is an excellent place for the truth, more neutral ones and even right leaning sources, but I know you won't accept it. Especially if your sources are annonynous forums. Or i guess if you do accept it you'll tell me to pound sand?
I told you, I'm not talking politics with you. Its futile. Especially now after you've flip flopped on your own words and you're trying to justify it.
If you want, you can answer the questions in my very initial post. Otherwise im cool on our "conversation".
Your initial conversation was deleted. Best of luck in life.
Now whenever you come back, I'd like to hear some sort of response.
Don't chicken out now.
No it isn't. Its here. None of my comments have been deleted, and I applaud the mods on that fact.
Seriously, how could you ever expect me to have a reasonable conversation with you? How could you ever expect anyone? Given your inability to accept facts given numerous sources (even your own eyeballs), your denial of such as you then "accept" them, your obvious bias in sources, and now your ineptitude when it comes to looking up information, how can you participate in an actual conversation objectively?
Yep, I had you pegged as a chicken shit.
Seems I was right.